Pokies Big Pharma Conspiracy

The Internet does all of that marketing for them.

Free Online Casino Slots

Pokie Review Purple Hibiscus

Pokie Review Purple Hibiscus

Pokie Review Purple Hibiscus
REVIEW

Pokies Aus Country Code

Pokies Aus Country Code

Pokies Aus Country Code
REVIEW

Novomatic Pokies Family Tumblr Love

Novomatic Pokies Family Tumblr Love

Novomatic Pokies Family Tumblr Love
REVIEW

Pokies Winner Election Of 1856

Pokies Winner Election Of 1856

Pokies Winner Election Of 1856
REVIEW

Pokies Big Quads Make Package

Pokies Big Quads Make Package

Pokies Big Quads Make Package
REVIEW

Pokies Big Winners Quotes Motivational Sports

Pokies Big Winners Quotes Motivational Sports

Pokies Big Winners Quotes Motivational Sports
REVIEW

Pokies Games Juegos Gratis

Pokies Games Juegos Gratis

Pokies Games Juegos Gratis
REVIEW

Aristocrat Pokie Games Free

Aristocrat Pokie Games Free

Aristocrat Pokie Games Free
REVIEW

All you have to do is an Internet search for "cures cancer" and you'll find an endless list of products being offered for sale. The bottom line here is that Big Pharma may not offer a natural product that cures all cancers, but they also don't do anything to suppress anyone outside their industry from doing it.

Saying that Big Pharma suppresses natural cures is exactly like saying Ford suppresses Chevrolet. Laetrile is an example of a product that was widely sold as a cure for cancer until it was banned by the FDA — "suppressed", some would prefer to say.

  • According to the Big Pharma conspiracy theory, the medical establishment in general and pharmaceutical companies in particular operate for sinister purposes and against the public good. Contents. [hide]. 1 History and definition; 2 Manifestations. Alternative treatments; HIV/AIDS; Medical coinsluckyz.comg: pokies.
  • In easy terms, remote play isn't that effective in PS3, if you want to play a number of the games with very high graphics details.
  • Say you Pokies Free Spin Games Downloads for weekend lounging the
  • There are comparable firms attempting to reach audiences like yours.
  • Jnet Verra Novomatic Pokies Blogspot Login Google obtain JackPot Fruit Machine Obtain Click the
  • A quick and easy way to hear the Big Pharma Conspiracy elucidated in detail by someone in your neighborhood today is to talk with any alternative medicine practitioner whose diploma is unaccredited, like a naturopath or a chiropractor. Ask why they didn't become a medical doctor, and nine times out of  Missing: pokies.
  • Don't Shannen Doherty Pokies Youtube Broadcast forget that there are web sites that are

The reason for the ban was that extensive clinical trials throughout the s and s proved that it had no effect on cancer whatsoever, except to give cyanide poisoning that was sometimes fatal. But true believers are still Pokies Big Pharma Conspiracy to find it; it can be bought online and in clinics, mainly in Mexico.

Today it's usually sold as "amygdalin" or "Vitamin B", even though it's not a vitamin and there's no such thing as Vitamin B Such cases as this, where the product is overtly toxic, are really the only cases one can find of a product being "suppressed" by Big Pharma. Finally, we can point to one more piece of evidence that any alleged Big Pharma Conspiracy does not seem to have any effect, and this is that the market for these allegedly-suppressed cures is just as big as Big Pokie Review Tablets Android market.

Americans spend almost exactly the same amount of money on FDA-approved pharmaceutical drugs as they do on unapproved drugs, basically supplements, vitamins, and all other herbal or natural remedies. Digging deeper into the conspiracy claims, we find that one of its fundamental assumptions is untrue. This assumption is that Big Pharma does not sell natural compounds, or compounds that they cannot patent. Both of these are trivially disproven. Nearly all research in the pharmaceutical industry starts in the lab with a petri dish, an incubator, and some compound found in nature.

This is why all pharmaceutical companies have research stations all around the world, staffed with molecular biologists; they are collecting compounds to study, to test against disease agents, and see which ones have potential for development into a product. But rarely can a natural compound be sold as-is, because in order to meet regulatory scrutiny, it has to be purified and the dose must be controlled.

The best way to do this is to find a way to synthesize the molecule in some controlled process. Do this, and the pills that come off the assembly line will all be homogenous in purity and in the exact dosage each contains. Oddly, anti-pharma activists tend to see this as a negative, preferring instead to put their faith in a version which has not undergone any meaningful manufacturing control. So the claim that Big Pharma doesn't sell natural products is false. It's equally false that they don't sell anything they can't patent.

Obviously they prefer patented products that allow them to monopolize the market for a time, but this is not unique to the pharmaceutical industry. It's the standard business practice in every industry, even in the natural supplements industry, where a quick read of many pill bottles reveals that the formulation is patented.

And, of course, patents don't last forever. A huge segment of the pharmaceutical industry is devoted to the manufacture and sale of generics, or even Pokies Big Pharma Conspiracy products like aspirin. The patent for aspirin expired during World War I, yet it remains a hugely profitable product, and is sold by virtually every Big Pharma company.

It's one thing to believe conspiracy theories like all the world's leaders are reptilian aliens in electronic disguises, or the Air Force does experiments on captured aliens at Area 51, because those don't impact the lives of intelligent adults in the real world.

But the Big Pharma Conspiracy does. It suggests, enables, and encourages distrust of the medical profession. Obviously, that's bad for the public health.

It drives people toward those alternative medicine practitioners whose professions may be free of conspiracy theories, but are unfortunately also free of effectiveness.

The Big Pharma Conspiracy also takes attention away from the real problems that exist within the pharmaceutical industry. Using his technical experience combined with his love for natural health, Adams developed and deployed the content management system currently driving NaturalNews.

How Big Pharma is Killing Americans...

Adams is well known for his incredibly popular consumer activism video blowing the lid on fake blueberries used throughout the food supply. He has also exposed "strange fibers" found in Chicken McNuggetsfake academic credentials of so-called health "gurus," dangerous "detox" products imported as battery acid and sold for oral consumption, fake acai berry scamsthe California raw milk raidsthe vaccine research fraud revealed by industry whistleblowers and many other topics.

Adams has also helped defend the rights of home gardeners and protect the medical freedom rights of parents. Adams is widely recognized to have made a remarkable global impact on issues like GMOs, vaccines, nutrition therapies, human consciousness. In addition to his activism, Adams is an accomplished musician who has released over a dozen popular songs covering a variety of activism topics.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Pokies Big Pharma Conspiracy. Support Natural News by linking to this article from your website Permalink to this article: Big Pharma criminality no longer a conspiracy theory: Bribery, fraud, price fixing now a matter of public record Reprinting this article: Non-commercial use OK, cite NaturalNews.

Are you really ready for ? Vehicles could run on itwithout having to be altered - NaturalNews.

Cannabis found to reduce inflammation in the brain, preventing mental decline of people with HIV - NaturalNews. Study reveals it is detrimental to brain health, contributes to dementia, causes weight gain - NaturalNews. This could be your final prepper warning - NaturalNews.

Phil outed for allegedly providing drugs and alcohol to addiction victims to make his shows more entertaining - NaturalNews. Flu vaccine found to be completely ineffective because of how it is made, new study finds - NaturalNews. There is definitely a Real Australian Pokies Download between autism and mercury - NaturalNews.

New research finds a broken heart permanently weakens the organ in a similar way - NaturalNews. High aluminum concentrations discovered in brain tissue of autistic children - NaturalNews. United Nations admits latest outbreak of polio in Syria was caused by polio vaccines - NaturalNews. Official story of Las Vegas shooting unravels; physical impossibility of lone gunman senior citizen makes narrative ludicrous - NaturalNews. Blockade the lying mainstream media and recognize the independent media as America's real free press 51 Kellogg's found to have financial ties to the money man for cop-killing left-wing HATE groups: George Soros Advertise with NaturalNews Health News Liberal media admits: The ultimate goal is gun confiscation from all citizens Wars keep on killing: The health of your gut microbiome could predict your risk of heart disease, researchers find Naturalnews.

Improve circulation and productivity with a cold shower: Study finds it provides an energy boost similar to coffee, resulting in fewer days off work Naturalnews.

What's your risk-taking IQ? Research suggests how much risk we're willing to take is pre-wired Naturalnews. The gift that keeps on giving Babies who were exclusively breastfed have less than half the risk of eczema as teenagers than those that were not Naturalnews. Privacy Terms All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only.

It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Truth Publishing assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms and those published here.

All trademarks, registered trademarks and servicemarks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners. Get alerted on heavy metals and pesticide test results for foods and supplements Natural News is about to begin releasing lab test results for off-the-shelf food, supplement and pet food products, covering heavy metals, nutritive minerals, pesticides and herbicides.

To be alerted, join our free email newsletter now, and watch for lab test results in the weeks ahead. Enter your email address below to subscribe to our email announcement list but don't use gmail. Your privacy is protected Pokies Big Pharma Conspiracy you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you don't join our email list, you may never see our valuable content again via Facebook, Google or YouTube. The truth is being suffocated.

Subscribe now if you want to escape the delusional bubble of false reality being pushed by Google and Facebook. GlaxoMerckfraud. NaturalNews Those of us who have long been describing the pharmaceutical industry as a "criminal racket" over the last few years have been wholly vindicated by recent news.

The world of independent media, all in one Pokies Big Pharma Conspiracy. Imagine just how many thousands of people would be necessary for Big Pharma to suppress a cure for cancer, a shockingly common conspiracy theory. And that figure doesn't include employees at smaller companies, academic scientists, the FDA, or health journalists.

A recent example, discussed in the journal Nature Biotechnologywas the global heparin crisis. Heparin is a vital, life-saving chemical used in hospitals all over the world as a blood thinner. Its supply chain, as the New York Times describeswas long, complicated, and poorly regulated. Heparin is derived from pig intestine, and much of this raw material and processing occurs in China. The adulterated product made its way into the United States, where it killed several dozen people and resulted in shortages following a massive recall.

See figure for the timeline events. As shown, the crisis began inwhen several dozen people died and hundreds of others had allergic reactions to the adulterated heparin. This spurred the FDA to action. By the end ofthe FDA had already worked with the pharmaceutical industry to create superior quality control methods that could detect adulteration or other contamination of heparin. Following yet more analysis and international collaboration, a new set of safety protocols was finalized in

case you win

One of the most famous cases concerned heparin, a blood thinner that's used extensively in surgery and dialysis. Let's take a look at recent revelations: The problem is compounded by outside forces, such as journalists, investigators, and regulators, who are always on the lookout for suspicious activity.

Code: Big Pokies Conspiracy Pharma order

Game console manufacturers have 3 Reel Pokies Female Superheroes may very similar eBay with some

  1. Big Pharma conspiracy theories involve a shadowy, gigantic cabal of drug companies that control everything we do related to health. While some conspiracies about pharmaceutical companies are far-fetched nonsense, others have some truth to them. Big Pharma Is Killing Holistic Missing: pokies.:
    Also if your roomates cant handle weed they would most likely fall in the same trap with fast food or alcohol. You keep talking about someone pushing for legalization, who are you so worried about? Here are the anti marjuana people: Big pharma Big tabacco Alcohol producers Prison industrial complex Fbi. DAMNING new research on the effect of poker machines has found the rate of problem gambling is three times higher in Victoria than in Western Australia, whose only gaming machines are in the Burswood casino." " Victorians spend $ a year on gambling compared with just $ in Western Australia. It is absolutely ridiculous. I have had a doctor tell me something could kill my · Informed ConsentThe VaccinesChildren's HealthFood FactsA DoctorDoctor OfficeFood For ThoughtWake UpEducation. Withholding information is the same as lying. What big pharma has been doing to us, without our knowledge or informed.
  2. Real sarah palin pokies images yahoo real estate. See more. Totalitarian medicine: Medical boards threaten to destroy careers of doctors who question Big Pharma propaganda .. Former FDA commissioner Margaret Hamburg named in massive conspiracy and racketeering lawsuit involving Johnson & Johnson.:
    She watches the reels spin and, once they've stopped, she likes to look at the end combination and see how close she might have been to a big win, or work out which lines she's won on. She doesn't play fast; maybe 10 games a minute, which is pretty slow for a poker machine. Pokies will let you play. American association of surgeons and physicians.
  3. :
  4. :

Test Pokies Big Pharma Conspiracy have idea

students just

Each has different narratives, but they always cast "Big Pharma" as the villain of the piece. In Natural Cures "They" Don't Want You to Know About , Kevin Trudeau proposes that there are all-natural cures for serious illnesses including cancer , herpes , arthritis , AIDS , acid reflux disease , various phobias , depression , obesity , diabetes , multiple sclerosis , lupus , chronic fatigue syndrome , attention deficit disorder , muscular dystrophy , and that these are all being deliberately hidden and suppressed from the public by the Food and Drug Administration, the Federal Trade Commission , and the major food and drug companies.

In a column for Harper's Magazine , journalist Celia Farber claimed that the antiretroval drug nevirapine was part of a conspiracy by the "scientific-medical complex" to spread toxic drugs. The Big Pharma conspiracy theory is markedly different in Big Pharma vs medical marijuana , as the pharmaceutical industry has been relatively open about their stance. Due to the pharmaceutical industry's concerns of medical marijuana adversely impacting sales of prescription drugs, the industry with help from the alcohol industry [7] has openly lobbied and campaigned extensively against the decriminalization and legalization of medical marijuana, [8] including companies such as Insys Therapeutics Inc.

Kapoor was arrested and charged with leading a nationwide criminal conspiracy to illegally distribute an addictive prescription painkiller, making him the highest-ranking executive at Insys to be charged in the long-running investigation. Steven Novella writes that while the pharmaceutical industry has a number of aspects which justly deserve criticism, the "demonization" of it is both cynical and intellectually lazy.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. This article is about a conspiracy theory. For the pharmaceutical industry in general, see Pharmaceutical industry. Oxford English Dictionary Third ed. Natural scams "he" doesn't want you to know about ," Scientific American , March List of conspiracy theories.

Conspiracy - a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful. Theory - a supposition or a system of ideas intended to explain something.

Conspiracy Theory - a hypothesis that some covert but influential organization is responsible for a circumstance or event. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goals are a fairer, more transparent world and a better future for everyone. List of Confirmed Conspiracies. Rules are explained in depth at FAQ page. Why is there a massive push in favour Marijuana all of a sudden?

Yeah I get it was intentionally supressed and made illegal for baseless reasons in the past. And yes I support it being legalized and ive smoked it a few times in the past as well. My issue however is that isn't it kind of odd that all of a sudden you have this overwhelmingly one sided positive PR on marijuana and you hear almost nothing bad about it? Ive read articles claiming everything that marijuana smoking makes you more intelligent to curing malignant brain tumors. If I google it's negative effects I find almost nothing about that.

I can find more on the negative effects of masturbation then I can on weed. I find that hard to believe. Constant smoke inhalation, messing with your brain receptors and strict behavioral changes that I've seen in long term smokers personally should induce a healthy dose of skepticism. I mean is it really that far fetched to think that there is some kind of conspiracy to push marijuana and suppress its negative effects? Personally I really feel like somethings going on here. Like how certain musical celebrities are pushed regardless of talent and just by the shear numbers of people listening to them, they become megastars.

Sure there's a contribution of their gifts and talents but by far it's the powers that be, the old men in suits in the music industry that pull the trigger to decide that. It doesn't seem that impossible for drugs. Marijuana is a huge industry tobacco once was and they need more and more people on board.

It'll create more jobs in America then manufacturing and a bunch of other stuff. So really their is a very strong incentive to suppress any negative effects. It isn't sudden or new. The push for legalization began way back at the same time conservatives were busy making the penalties for possession and use harsher.

It has already been 20 years since California, the most populous state made medical marijuana legal in and propositions to make recreational use failed the first time it was on the ballot. You can't find anything bad because it's not bad for humans, if you use it all day everyday, yea there is changes but nothing detrimental health related.

In other words, business as usual, zero growth- just a shift in where profit is being made where it wasn't before. There are however, very man ways around smoking it. The rest of your argument may hold water, but smoking things harms your lungs in the most binary sense imaginable.

Besides, things like mood, appetite, and sleep are all regulated by endocannabinoids, and claiming without proof that these receptors won't be affected in some way after continuous stimulation is probably pretty naive.

Currently there's no link between marijuana use and lung cancer. One possibility is that marijuana has anti-cancer effects. No word on emphysema, although smokers who get it normally get it after a lifetime of pack-a-day smoking, so one or two joints per day might not have a significant impact. I'm certain friends have mentioned something similar to me, but I can't speak for them when I say I personally feel very like i build up mucus a lot more now, find myself coughing more often, and I think I take heavier breaths when I've smoked recently too.

Like I said, smoking anything isn't good for you. You lungs shouldn't be full of smoke, and I'm certain our bodies are biologically coded to seek out clean and fresh air. I stopped smoking it over ten years ago. There are a lot of other ways to consume it like dabbing and vaping that do not require combustion. I feel like it's distraction.

Give them a little carrot to distract away from the bigger picture. Also have everyone stoned would be a good way to make them apathetic?? Marijuana does not make one apathetic. If anything it makes people more introspective and open to new ideas, especially sativa varieties. There are also lots of people who would lose money if it were to be even partially legalized prisons, law enforcement, pharmaceutical that aren't pushing back at all.

Man I just can't believe that smoking something everyday won't have a negative effect on you somehow. I've seen two of my own roommates become reclusive, paranoid and borderline violent over the two years they began smoking marijuana regularly.

Also just by virtue of the act of smoking itself one has to recognize that constant smoke inhalation just can't be good for you in the long term. Smoking anything has health effects but that's due to the smoking and not the weed imo, you can take advantage of THC in many other ways besides smoking edibles, oil, etc that presumably would eliminate that risk. I hear ya, but you're wrong. Do more research, it cures diseases and helps many people with depression, anorexia, etc.

As someone who smokes frequently, its the best thing for me, I don't drink, and smoking relaxes my mind, connects me stronger to my spirituality, gives me answers I am seeking if I'm stressed, makes me laugh and enjoy life on a whole more. Look at someone like Snoop dogg, dude smokes blunts and an insane amount of weed all day everyday for decades.

There are thousands upon thousands of people who live that way and are completely fine. Sounds like you're roommates probably have other issues, it's not weed thats the problem.

I have extremely addictive behavior. I have drank and used just about every substance to the point of destroying everything in my life. Aside from getting arrested with it and doing a few years in the pokie I know, huge exception. It had no other negative impact on my life. If it would have been legal I don't even think the rest of my life would have played out how it did. I've been sober for years, and my life is amazing now.

And I stay away from pot because I am just so compulsive it is dangerous to engage in any usage. But pot is the only thing I miss. While you're not wrong my personal experience is if I smoke it multiple times a day for multiple days of the week I feel sluggish and easily irritated in the following days. Can't think as clearly and not as much motivation. I'm more productive if I simply smoke once or twice a week or not at all.

Everybody is different so don't go calling people wrong for talking about something they observed. You can list all the benefits and I will whole heartedly agree.

I'll argue till I'm blue in the face for legalization. But it's naive to think just because it has a million different benefits that it can only have positive effects on every aspect of life with every single person. Show me the research that proves that decades of heavy smoking will do no damage whatsoever to your throat, esophagus or lungs. You can't because it doesn't exist. Just because no studies have yet to prove the long term negative health effects of marijuana does not mean they don't exist.

So we should make something illegal because there is still a possibility that it can be harmful, despite hundreds of years of people smoking weed with zero deaths that can be directly related to marijuana. What is your point? We have enough data to show most people are fine smoking weed. Im tired of you idiots bringing up garbage points when people are doing prison time for smoking a joint. Some how its fucked up if hilary clinton gets pedos free but when kids are getting locked up for smoking weed you squares are only concern with the unfound negative effects.

Sounds more like you have a personal insecurity when it comes to pot than a valid point. I never said anything about making it illegal. Go back and read my post. No idea where you got that from. I am a heavy pot user. I just don't deny that there are serious negative health effects that come from smoking a drug for decades.

Eh, I'm in a rec legal state and some hybrids make me really paranoid. I just stick with indica mostly. Oh, yeah, I get paranoid over those things, but also unwarranted fears like being terrified that one of my kids are going to slip and fall in the tub and break their neck someday, that I can't drive over a mountain pass again or I'm going off a cliff, etc.

I already have paranoid tendencies, so I just have to be careful what I take. Indica edibles are my go-to. If you get paranoid stick your nose in a jar of whole peppercorns and inhale through it for seconds. Trust me - weird but works.

Regardless of the legality of your state, there is still an institutionalized stigma aganist weed and often times attract unwarranty police attention. Like if my neighbors see me smoking weed I know they will never look at me the same since they will think im doing drugs!

Just wanting to maintain a normal relationship will induce paranoia. Yup, I own several businesses, play golf 5 times a week, swim several times a week, have a great relationship with myself, my friends, family, work and spirituality. I attribute a huge amount of my creativity, passion, success, mental health all to marijuana. My wife and I smoke all the time and have been together 6 years, no drinking, no partying, no BS. Alcohol is a poison and drinking, opiates, etc.

To each their own but just look at the countless people who smoke all day everyday and they're doing just fine. Don't you feel like it is a crutch though?

I have no issue with weed, but I think you're kidding yourself. I respect your journey though. I gave up weed and alcohol 2 years ago and find my life to be much more meaningful. But I am also 36 and have a small child. You may find later in life it feels like it's holding you back more than it does now.

Either way I appreciate your posts and have nothing but love for you. If one really wants to change themselves, they'll do it. Mindfulness in all areas is most important above all. Not that it matters, I've smoked MJ since '12, if anything my life has become swell since then. If you are talking about the federal government, weed is atill federally illegal and banks wont allow you to process payments or deposit in accounts.

Overall the industry still remains at a cash to cash. There isnt a government mandate needed to open the doors, states simply exercised state rights to host ballots to have the people decide. California has been trying to get the proposition past for years and it finally happened along with the other states. State votes actually matters to some extend unlike presidential elections. You need to consider how much money is wasted prosecuting people for possession of something relatively harmless, as well.

While I agree it is about money. I think it is because Tulsi Gabbard just introduced a bill in congress to end marijuana prohiition, so everyone is speaking there mind to try to sway the result.

trader's success

The Big Pharma conspiracy theory is markedly different in Big Pharma vs medical marijuana , as the pharmaceutical industry has been relatively open about their stance.

Due to the pharmaceutical industry's concerns of medical marijuana adversely impacting sales of prescription drugs, the industry with help from the alcohol industry [7] has openly lobbied and campaigned extensively against the decriminalization and legalization of medical marijuana, [8] including companies such as Insys Therapeutics Inc.

Kapoor was arrested and charged with leading a nationwide criminal conspiracy to illegally distribute an addictive prescription painkiller, making him the highest-ranking executive at Insys to be charged in the long-running investigation.

Steven Novella writes that while the pharmaceutical industry has a number of aspects which justly deserve criticism, the "demonization" of it is both cynical and intellectually lazy. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. This article is about a conspiracy theory.

For the pharmaceutical industry in general, see Pharmaceutical industry. Oxford English Dictionary Third ed. Natural scams "he" doesn't want you to know about ," Scientific American , March List of conspiracy theories. Attitude polarization Cognitive dissonance Communal reinforcement Confirmation bias Locus of control Mass hysteria Paranoia Psychological projection. Kennedy Robert F. Denial of mass killings list Genocide denial. Pop culture tells us that the big pharmaceutical companies know all about the simple, natural cures for everything — cancer included — but are jealously covering them up.

Should you be unfortunate enough to contract some terminal illness, the best the doctors are going to give you is some synthetic, patented drug that can be sold to you at a high profit.

It won't work as well as that natural treatment would, but that's OK, because it means they get to sell it to you over and over again, until you finally die.

You've just been victimized by the Big Pharma Conspiracy, one of the most popularly believed conspiracy theories. How could it be that I've been doing Skeptoid for almost 11 years and never covered the Big Pharma Conspiracy? The basic Big Pharma Conspiracy says that pharmaceutical companies suppress natural cures on the principle that they are not patentable and thus not profitable to sell; so they instead distribute only patented, expensive, and less effective drugs. This allows them to keep profits up, and since the drugs are less effective, it keeps the patients sick enough to require more and more of the expensive products.

Most familiar is the claim that a perfect cure for all cancers exists, but Big Pharma suppresses it because if everyone was cancer-free it would kill their profitable cancer business.

A corollary takes it a step further, asserting that the drug companies actually create some of the diseases that make their products necessary. An abstract entity comprised of corporations, regulators, NGOs, politicians, and often physicians, all with a finger in the trillion-dollar prescription pharmaceutical pie.

This definition is important, because it allows the conspiracy theorist to vastly simplify what is, in reality, a complicated industry filled with conflicting roles and interests. Lumping them all together into a single entity turns them into a proverbial "they" at whom it is easy to point an accusing finger. A quick and easy way to hear the Big Pharma Conspiracy elucidated in detail by someone in your neighborhood today is to talk with any alternative medicine practitioner whose diploma is unaccredited, like a naturopath or a chiropractor.

Ask why they didn't become a medical doctor, and nine times out of ten, they'll recite the Big Pharma Conspiracy narrative point for point, all the way down the line. All one needs to do is a web search for the term "Big Pharma" and look at the headlines that appear:. One piece of evidence suggesting the Big Pharma Conspiracy might not be as successful as its believers claim is that real conspiracies are discovered and eradicated in the industry all the time.

One of the most famous cases concerned heparin, a blood thinner that's used extensively in surgery and dialysis. Most of it comes from suppliers in China where it is derived from pig intestines. Suddenly people began dying on the operating table and suffering severe allergic reactions, and it was traced to this contaminated heparin. The FDA ordered it all recalled, which resulted in a catastrophic shortage.

Lacking any enforcement ability inside China, the FDA put stringent new testing standards in place for the companies that sold heparin, shifting the burden from the Chinese suppliers to the American distributers. Big Pharma stood to profit billions from selling the cheaper but dangerous contaminated version, but Big Pharma brought the hammer down hard and put a stop to it.

Another piece of evidence that Big Pharma doesn't suppress natural cures is that natural products are widely available; you can buy them in any supermarket. Pick any natural compound you can think of, and you'll find that someone sells it. Regulators don't put a stop to this, except in cases where the product is toxic.

The most they can do is require sellers to include the disclaimer alongside their labeling for what they claim the product does:.

These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. Even if they're not allowed to make a false claim on the labeling like "It cures all cancers", that doesn't hurt a thing. The Internet does all of that marketing for them. All you have to do is an Internet search for "cures cancer" and you'll find an endless list of products being offered for sale.

The bottom line here is that Big Pharma may not offer a natural product that cures all cancers, but they also don't do anything to suppress anyone outside their industry from doing it. Saying that Big Pharma suppresses natural cures is exactly like saying Ford suppresses Chevrolet. Laetrile is an example of a product that was widely sold as a cure for cancer until it was banned by the FDA — "suppressed", some would prefer to say. The reason for the ban was that extensive clinical trials throughout the s and s proved that it had no effect on cancer whatsoever, except to give cyanide poisoning that was sometimes fatal.

But true believers are still able to find it; it can be bought online and in clinics, mainly in Mexico. Today it's usually sold as "amygdalin" or "Vitamin B", even though it's not a vitamin and there's no such thing as Vitamin B Such cases as this, where the product is overtly toxic, are really the only cases one can find of a product being "suppressed" by Big Pharma.

Finally, we can point to one more piece of evidence that any alleged Big Pharma Conspiracy does not seem to have any effect, and this is that the market for these allegedly-suppressed cures is just as big as Big Pharma's market. Americans spend almost exactly the same amount of money on FDA-approved pharmaceutical drugs as they do on unapproved drugs, basically supplements, vitamins, and all other herbal or natural remedies. Digging deeper into the conspiracy claims, we find that one of its fundamental assumptions is untrue.

This assumption is that Big Pharma does not sell natural compounds, or compounds that they cannot patent. Both of these are trivially disproven. Nearly all research in the pharmaceutical industry starts in the lab with a petri dish, an incubator, and some compound found in nature. This is why all pharmaceutical companies have research stations all around the world, staffed with molecular biologists; they are collecting compounds to study, to test against disease agents, and see which ones have potential for development into a product.

But rarely can a natural compound be sold as-is, because in order to meet regulatory scrutiny, it has to be purified and the dose must be controlled. The best way to do this is to find a way to synthesize the molecule in some controlled process. Do this, and the pills that come off the assembly line will all be homogenous in purity and in the exact dosage each contains. Oddly, anti-pharma activists tend to see this as a negative, preferring instead to put their faith in a version which has not undergone any meaningful manufacturing control.

cost

My 'observations' were just that I wouldn't have too many personal observations of actual players, since we mutually ignore each other. I attended the National Center for Responsible Gaming whatever the organization is called, the C might stand for Council conference on gambling and addiction, and what I said was bite-sized pieces of what they were talking about in general. And you're right--in my lecture notes I had put "play more aggressively" in quotes because I didn't know what they meant by it either.

I figured maybe they got anxious or something and couldn't handle the split-second more per spin. As for the paranoid player suspecting a casino conspiracy Certainly some portion of pokie-players are paranoid! I had hoped they would speak more on free will or some more philosophical aspects of problem gambling Particularly when it comes to the negative impact poker machines now have on the psychological health of a significant number of people in South Australia, yes - I am THAT certain!

YoHB, It is blatantly obvious that if you take away the product that creates the majority of cases of Pathological Gamblers then the number of Pathological Gamblers will fall thus decreasing the burden on mental health services. Unless you think all the psychiatrists out there are making their living off of pokie addicts and are actively denying services to all the people with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, alcoholism, and garden-variety neuroses.

Just a definitional clarification--the State could change the definition of "mentally ill" to "tried to kill himself or others and ONLY tried to kill himeslf or others" so that "has a problem with self-esteem" would not meet the State's criteria of "mentally ill" and would therefore not warrant treatment.

With this hypothetical definition, even "thought about killing himself or others" would not warrant treatment--so less money would be spent on treating the mentally ill, simply because the definition is narrower. This narrower definition would be needed after the funding from the pokies is lost. What I said was: The loss of funds creates a narrower definition so that fewer will need the now smaller funds.

The loss of gaming machines means fewer people will become addicts. And where is your thesis on the similarities between bipolar mania and pathological gambling? I can give you no incentive to find it other than my promise that I am very interested in reading it. I hope I am being more blatantly obvious now. I come from the position that a person who develops a problem with gambling either had pscychological problems to begin with or were prone to addiction to anything, be it drugs, gambling, or carrots and would, without available gambling venues, express this in some other way.

Just because you take away the razor blade does not mean the person is no longer suicidal! If you mean, "fewer people will have psychological problems directly caused by gambling," you are correct. OK, I will concede that the availability of gambling may be the right 'trigger' for somebody's mental collapse--it is blatantly obvious that a person cannot be addicted to something that is not there and you know what I mean so don't pull any funny liguistic tricks on this one.

But, a rape may trigger a latent bipolar disorder. A car accident could trigger a manifestation of a latent tendency toward PTSD. Smoking pot could trigger latent schizophrenia. So, if all kinds of gambling, alcohol, military recruitment in high schools, homosexuality, illicit drugs, and abortion are legal and above-board, we will have little problem identifying those who need help, since they will not suffer in the privacy of their own homes, they'll be out robbing banks or passing out in the public gutters or killing themselves at which point they are no longer a problem.

The next problem is actually helping these people! At the conference they seriously suggested a large-scale anti-gambling indoctrination campaign.

There is NO evidence to suggest this is so - quite the opposite in fact. I am seriously NOT into "psychiatric disturbance is caused by chemical imbalance in the brain" paradigm that the people who propose the idea that those who develop psych disturbances have some kind of genetic propensity for developing what they do seem to hold and I'm not saying you do - only that most people who propose the propensity theory of psych disturbances, also hold the genetic lack of certain brain chemicals is the root cause of psych disturbances.

The whole notion of psych disturbances being genetic is steeped in hindsight bias IMHO as the appearance of symptoms regardless of the presence or otherwise of trauma is offered up as evidence to confirm the genetic propensity theory, rather than good longitudinal scientific research confirming it.

I don't care who you are, if you are getting badly beaten every day by some brute, you will become stressed and depressed and develop psychological coping methods we know as "psychological disturbances". No amount of psych meds will improve the depression a person suffers unless the cause in this case, the beatings stops. In my opinion and that of many people in the care sector depression indicates that we need to change something that is happening in our lives.

If we were to remain happy in the face of all abuse, addiction or whatever, then we wouldn't be motivated to change what is harming or disturbing us. Could it be the pro-gambling lobbyists? Restricting poker machines to large venues very large clubs and casinos would allow two things: It would remove the temptation for a large number of problem gamblers who are otherwise tempted to play at smaller, local gambling parlours.

It would permit the introduction of responsible gaming law that would put serious accountability for the management of problem gamblers. The government state and federal collectively would not really lose out. If anything it would gain. Slot profits are generally concentrating amongst a minority of hotel owners or individuals, who are no doubt good at reducing their tax liability.

This money would otherwise be spent by gamblers on goods and services GST tax revenue, as well as boosting consumer sales which generate jobs that boost PAYE income tax revenue or saved. States that wind back their slot population to under and introduce a serious Responsible Gambling and Money Laundering accountability should receive compensated revenue from the federal government. I am seriously NOT into "psychiatric disturbance is caused by chemical imbalance in the brain" paradigm It presents likely reasons for modern mood distubances depression and bipolar disorder from an evolutionary perspective.

This has nothing to do with people gambling, but if you want a cool something-to-do-with-gambling book I recommend George Ainslie's Breakdown of Will. Go ahead and read them concurrently I zipped through them both with lightning speed. The whole notion of psych disturbances being genetic Genograms are very important when performing a psychiatric evaluation.

This type of documentation has allowed us to back up with numbers the statement, "if one of your first-degree relatives has bipolar disorder, you are at 20 times greater risk for developing it than a random person on the street," which in turn helps us in diagnosis and treatment. Check out the Amish mental illness study, or see how quickly you can find it on Google. Are you entirely on the "nurture" side of this?

That is a very brave position to hold and somewhat True Believer-ish , but if you ever get involuntarily committed to a mental hospital, nobody will believe you when you say you just had a bad day.

No amount of psych meds will improve the depression a person suffers unless the cause Unless the cause is the amount of serotonin in your synapses This definite "depression IS" standpoint is interesting, and I don't fully accept it. You must admit that some people succumb to depression, bipolar disorder, or schizophrenia those being The Big Three WITHOUT having had a stressful childhood or critical environmental trigger.

Is this a character flaw? An indication of weak willpower? If a person says, "My depression has a biological basis just like diabetes, and can be successfully treated with the proper medication," is he making a societally acceptable excuse for simple bad behavior? Wouldn't a "character flaw" or "weak willpower" have biological origins anyway? Let the Big Three get medications and therapy if they can afford it , and all the neurotics can just get cognitive therapy and quit blaming society for their insecurities.

When I say "neurotic" I am referring to the non-psychotic mental illnesses, including panic disorder, OCD, and the personality disorders--pretty much anything you would call "crazy" but which would not be one of The Big Three. And is it kosher to bypass the character limit by posting twice? I have recently entered the field of research into gambling problems, having been previously concerned with the study of responses to other forms of addiction, chiefly licit and illicit drugs.

One idea now accepted among those researching alcohol problems is that the more we drink as a nation, the more alcohol problems we as a nation experience. There are not two separate nations of drinkers, one who can drink as much as they like with impunity and another who experience and cause all the problems.

This is termed the 'single distribution theory' of alcohol problems. From my initial research in this new field, the same appears to be true for gambling.

As the number of people taking part in gambling and the total amount of money spent on gambling increases, so the level of problem gambling will also increase. There also appears to be growing evidence that levels of gambling and therefore of problem gambing are strongly linked to the levels of perceived and actual opportunity to gamble. I attach abstracts of two research articles in support of this claim, one examining the effects on the local community of opening a casino in Niagara Falls, Ontario and the other looking at the impact on gambling and problem gambling of introduction of the National Lottery iin the UK.

I'd be interested in colleagues' comments. Suffer from that particular character flaw myself. Thank goodness for MS word and auto-summarize tool. I accept that very often the triggers for the 'Big Three' are neither sought by psych's nor expressed by suffers of them. The former have already decided what the cause is and the latter don't have knowledge of the way the human personality develops.

No - but by accepting that it's his genetic makeup that's suddenly and unexplicably gone haywire, and that psych meds have "fixed" the problem, the person becomes both dependant on his psychiatrist and unlikely to take person responsibility for himself in the future. For the record, in mid , at the age of 44 I had a psych diagnosis of schizo affective disorder. The diagnosis was made by one psych and confirmed by another.

I had no previous psych history if you don't count a tendency towards verbosity. No major childhood traumas but did have three assaults on my sense of self within a few weeks of each other. I coped with the first Iwould have handled the second with time, but the third was too much - ergo, schizoaffective disorder, and if you like a major seretonin imbalance in my brain. Whether that seretonin imbalance started the problem or was caused by it, who can tell?

I take no meds - and never have done. I no longer suffer from schizo-affective disorder. If you understand anything about chemistry and osmosis etc, you'll realize that all chemical imbalance returns to a state of balance - given enough time. The chemicals floating around the brain are no different! Taking a slightly different angle, I have a point and a question: Is it standard-ish draw poker? I know my product can be addictive and dangerous to a relatively relative to Australian pokies, by the sound of it small proportion of my customers.

Isn't the degree and proportion irrelevant in this argument, but the fact that any proportion of potential addicts a reason to remove the product? Put another way, as long as there is a danger of addiction, shouldn't gambling products be banned in total, whatever that proportion and numbetrs involved?

Or is that your standpoint, and you're just starting with the most apparently dangerous one, which you have personal experince of? To try machines that look similar and play in much the same way as pokies do, go to; http: Isn't the degree and proportion irrelevant in this argument?

Not in my opinion. For example - Take Bingo. Initial outlay is small, but there are no line games and the prizes for marking off all the numbers on a card are small.

This sort of bingo is relatively benign. This enables people to play up to cards at a time. Winning numbers are rapidly drawn by a machine and winning tickets checked - by a machine - in barely a minute, leaving no time for players to chat. The latter form is apt to cause multiple problems for significant numbers of players and almost certainly cause a much greater proportion of players of it to become addicted than the former type would. If you have ever wonder what Australia's 'pokies' look and play like, check out the video of the news item regarding the "Touch Play" machines at, http: Like hell they are!

Chasing the digression further A brain 'chemical imbalance' is similar to a thyroid 'chemical imbalance' or a pancreas 'chemical imbalance.

I'm towing the NAMI line here, but a mental illness is no different from diabetes and both can be successfully treated with medications. The word 'balance' is somewhat misleading, since there IS a balance, but it will not always return to a healthy equilibrium, especially when portions of the brain are misfiring or when the organ in question is damaged.

In the Whybrow book I recommended, he discusses how a shock to the system like protracted sleep deprivation or an influx of drugs can somehow 'reset' the brain to a healthy balance, since it is in a way starting from the beginning--but this equilibrium does not last long, for soon the brain careens back toward its earlier malfunction.

And anyway, I halfway agree with you, but it is true that if the popular perception of mental illness is that it is a weakened will or a flaw, people will be less likely to seek treatment, whether that treatment turns out to be medications, therapy, or personal study of philosophy. One cannot adopt the extremes of this argument. Also, schizoaffective disorder is not a diagnosis I would make lightly or quickly.

I would question the motives of a physician who hurries to this diagnosis. I also do not condone your basing your perception of psychiatry, the Medical Industrial Complex, and Big Pharma on this one interaction I would think that if we, as schoolchildren, were taught healthy coping mechanisms for stressful situations and the importance of our sometimes overwhelming emotions, we would have fewer incidences of all manifestations of mental distress.

Nell, My point was that any form of gambling can be addictive - this is speaking from my own subjective viewpoint, without documented backup. I'm in Bingo for a living, and when you boil it down it isn't so different from the game you describe, except for the potential level of spend.

If 1 of my customers develops an addiction, due to a pre-existing proclivity towards addiction to gambling, shouldn't my bingo games be banned - because it's not the number of addicts you create, it's the fact you created even one?

And where do you draw the line between psychologically trying to play on the addictive nature of your product, and simply trying to sell more of it? I'm not asking as a snide rhetorical question, but because I'm curious. I said in a previous post that to examine the true impact of pokies, one must look at such things as credit defaults, bankruptcies, etc.

Sue - It is my view that there is a level of harm that can occur with some gambling products that is too great to be tolerated. I would not ban water because one person became addicted to drinking it Do we ban products that addict one percent of regular users of it, or five percent of regular users of it?

Personally, I do not know where the line should be drawn Newview - where do you draw the line between psychologically trying to play on the addictive nature of your product, and simply trying to sell more of it? Sue - Tough call. I'm glad it's not a decision I have to make. Perhaps the answer for you lies in the wording of your question. Namely in understanding when you are pushing the psychologically addictive aspects of the product in the selling of it, and how that differs from pushing the fun aspects of the activity in order to get more people to purchase it.

I think I'd be right in saying that when it comes to the promotion of any new bingo machines or whatever by the makers of those machines, there is little in their 'sell' about how much more fun it will make Bingo. The people who sell to you, know that the best way to make a sale is to tap into your greed and I don't mean that in a nasty way - most of us are greedy.

It is quite normal to want more money for less effort. So, ask yourself when considering changes, will this maximise my profits but ignore customer satisfaction, or will it make my Bingo parlour the place people want to come to because they have fun and get value for their dollar?

I am a Registered Nurse with 30 plus years experience in all areas of medical surgical and mental health nursing. Dietary deficiency for example can cause goitres, hypothyroidism, depression etc. Why is it that the role of environmental factors are ignored or minimized?

Could it be that psychiatrists are getting lazy or perhaps overwhelmed by the high demand for their services? Could it be that meds provide a quick fix for physician and client alike? I am also a great believer in evolution and the ability of the human body and mind to heal itself given the right conditions. Removed from stress, given the opportunity to rest and given empathic mirroring by a good enough mental health professional or caring freind, and I believe most people's psychological equilibrium will be restored.

While I hold this view, I will concede that no amount of rest and empathic mirroring will restore to normal functioning the mind of someone born with genetic defects and chemical deficits that are undetected and left untreated.

Sometimes, med are the only solution. Very interesting reply Sue, and one which I can fully understand. We don't know here to draw the line of tolerability, but it lies somewhere between highly addictive machines and not very addictive Bingo.

Incidentally, the biggest scandal in the UK in my opinion is that scratchcards can be actively promoted and sold to 16 year olds in the uk, when speaking without evidence they are very much hard gaming, interms of repeat play and cost versus income of the target market.

Easy to say from a casino operator, mind! The diagnosis in my case was valid. I was one sick puppy for about three years. It has taken time, a lot of work and the caring support of a good enough therapist to be well again.

I agree with you that some psychiatrists are just jerks. The Big Pharma conspiracy theory is markedly different in Big Pharma vs medical marijuana , as the pharmaceutical industry has been relatively open about their stance.

Due to the pharmaceutical industry's concerns of medical marijuana adversely impacting sales of prescription drugs, the industry with help from the alcohol industry [7] has openly lobbied and campaigned extensively against the decriminalization and legalization of medical marijuana, [8] including companies such as Insys Therapeutics Inc.

Kapoor was arrested and charged with leading a nationwide criminal conspiracy to illegally distribute an addictive prescription painkiller, making him the highest-ranking executive at Insys to be charged in the long-running investigation.

Steven Novella writes that while the pharmaceutical industry has a number of aspects which justly deserve criticism, the "demonization" of it is both cynical and intellectually lazy.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. This article is about a conspiracy theory. For the pharmaceutical industry in general, see Pharmaceutical industry.

Oxford English Dictionary Third ed. Natural scams "he" doesn't want you to know about ," Scientific American , March List of conspiracy theories. Attitude polarization Cognitive dissonance Communal reinforcement Confirmation bias Locus of control Mass hysteria Paranoia Psychological projection.

Kennedy Robert F. Denial of mass killings list Genocide denial.

might

Another option for slot machines which was not utilized, as far as I know, anywhere but Canada was to have a 'Help' screen easily accessible from the main screen at all times, which would have such helpful things as problem gambling information and hotline, and a page called "Can you improve your odds of winning? But I can easily imagine the players reasoning like so: The casino doesn't want me to wear my lucky charm because it knows that helps me to win.

Why should I listen to the advice the casino gives me? This is certainly becoming more and more of a hot topic now that Non-Smoking in venues has made its way through in most states.

Another issue the lobbyists can attack against our blatant disregard for our high Christian beliefs and moral standings.

Lets face it gambling has been around since the dawn of time almost as long as prostitution. Now seriously, More exposure to gambling will help to contribute to more people gambling. As with, the more exposure to counselling services will help to contribute to more people getting counselling. I don't know how many gambling counselling services outside of Perth remembering that WA is about the size of Europe and them some compared to Vic.

The same again, when it comes to exposure. WA is a very large state with a very small population. How often would somebody outside of Perth even drive by Newsagents to have the chance to buy a lottery ticket. I spent four months travelling around WA a few years ago and I honestly believe that it has to one of the most remote areas of the civilised world.

Are these people in this situation as a manifest of another problem bringing them to cause themselves psychological self harm? If so, if they did not choose gambling as this self destruction what percentage of these people decide to use other means of destruction eg. Out of all of these substitutes at least when this very small percentage of the community who chooses to 'get their fix' on gambling at least they are helping to create many jobs and contributing money to the counselling services that are needed to help this person.

Can you say the same for the drug addicted community? At the end of the day, Yes, Pokies are yet another evil in the gambling empire along with every other scratchy ticket, lotto ticket, TAB and literally hundreds of gambling sites on the internet of which have a higher exposure to the general public than Pokies. Why pick on the pokies? In Australia, drug addicts don't pay any more for their counselling than gamblers do - in most instances, counselling for addicts is paid for by the state.

As for the "small percentage of the community who chooses to 'get their fix' on gambling" helping to create more jobs, the latest research to come out of Victoria clearly shows this is not so - there were just 10, more people employed in hotels and clubs in Victoria as a result of gaming machines Who suggested that "scratchy ticket, lotto ticket, TAB, internet gambling" were evil and should be gone?

These gambling products are not anywhere near as harm causing as the pokies even if there are more outlets for them. If you don't mind me saying so, this is crud! When push comes to shove, the labour party conscience vote on the issue - and most of them tend to support the industry because, "the workers deserve the opportunity to gamble after working hard all day" There is little "opposition" to gaming machines in political circles in Australia MP's may try and stir the pot by claiming the ruling party aren't doing anything to stop the problem caused by gaming machines, but when they get into power, they merely become fodder for the new opposition.

Why do I "pick on the pokies"? What evidence do you have for saying this? The fact is that when the betting cycle was slower back in the days of the old pull handle, mechanical machines , there were fewer regular players who got hooked. The faster the bet cycle, the more likely it is that the behaviour of regular players will be conditioned, that they will overspend and start chasing their losses.

The idea that a gaming machine addict HAS to have something to help them cope with life, is simply wrong. The South Carolina experience makes a mockery of the notion that once machines are removed from society, the people addicted to it will take up some other addiction.

What is the likely outcome of such an investigation? The answer lies in a comment by "the government" appearing in the Age After spending hundreds of thousands of dollars, the government will find that, "There is nothing illegal about Mr Mathieson running pokies in pubs and clubs". They will also discover that there is nothing wrong with individuals profiting from "investing in" or "managing" hotels and clubs with pokies. Call me a cynic, but 'governments' see what they want to see and disregard the rest.

In my opinion, this "investigation" is part of the process that will set Victoria up for the end of the duopoly and the begining of "destination resorts" that will allow the gaming machine industry to expand into country areas despite the evidence that country communities that introduce gaming in Australia actually suffer economic loss from the move. There will no doubt be NO questioning of the validity of the notion that destination resorts increase tourism to country areas during this "investigation".

This notion will be accepted despite the well researched fact that the building of destination resorts does not boost tourism any more. Lets face it, people no longer need to travel far to gamble these days and pokies taxes paid to the state by rural gaming venues are NOT returned in fact OR in kind to the communities from whence they come in anywhere near the amounts that leave it. I am entering late into this debate, but I from my own dark experience I wish to give my 0.

Nell, your cause is just and correct, but you speak with too much emotion and too little objectivity, and therefore do you cause more harm than good. A total ban will never be accepted, and is not necessary. But slots belong in one place only Not pubs, clubs, or anywhere else, which are just slot parlours pretending to be be noble community institutions.

And if slots are confined to casinos, the following should apply: ID must be shown to enter a slot gaming area, and casino operators must be held accountable for monitoring slot players. Self-exclusion should be available and a mandatory 1 year. Subsequent barrings should be life-long. There is no doubt that Slot addiction in Australia is like the iceberg to the Titanic. To get any indication of the true impact researchers should look at the increase in such things as credit defaults, debt levels especially credit cards and morgage forclosures since slots have become introduced into a community.

Australia has one of the highest credit card debts per capita than anywhere in the world. And it has only really dramatically increased since slots were introduced. However, I fear your cause is in vain. Like cane toads, I believe Pokies are a pest that will inflict damage on the "Lucky Country's" socio-economic environment for years to come.

Hello Litespped, Welcome to the forum and an excellent post. Just a few minutes ago I found this story about a slot player in Victoria who had signed up to the Australian Hotels Association's self-exclusion programme.

It makes interesting reading and in not one of the venues he subsequently entered did he have a problem playing. Sweaty palms all for nothing http: Was the programme the minimum requirement legislators in Victoria required?

Thank you for the warm welcome Ian, Voluntary self-exclusion is a joke, and shows a complete disregard for the understanding of the word "addiction".

The temptation has to be significantly reduced or removed altogether. I would suggest a simple experiment: Whilst they go about normal living routine, apply the following: Allow them free access to all nearby slots. Note their playing behaviour. Deny them access to all slots within 15 minutes travel. Deny them access to all slots within 30 minutes travel.

Deny them access to all slots within 90 minutes travel. Unfortunately in Australia, this would be a difficult experiment to perform without fitting every person with a tracking device, as gambling establishments entry control is poor or non existent. Europe and perhaps NZ is showing that the only effective method is making gambling establishments accountable.

When things get really bad: Self-exclusion contracts were first offered by the industry in Australia as part of their push for self-regulation. They claim that offering self-exclusion contracts is evidence of their commitment as hosts to reducing problem gambling. When it fails to acheive the desired result i. If problem gamblers felt confident in their ability to stay away, they wouldn't feel the need to ask the venues to PREVENT them from entering a venue.

In my experience, gamblers think that by signing a self-exclusion contract, they are agreeing to the venue stopping them at the door thereby embarrassing the heck out of them AND fining them for attempting to gamble. What the venues think they are agreeing to and I acknowledge that I'm just guessing here is that if they catch the gambler on their premises, they can take back any winnings the gambler gets and fine the gamblers for breeching the terms of contract by entering the venue - IF being the operative word here.

What needs to be changed with regards to self-exclusion contracts in my view is; 1 there needs to be fines imposed on BOTH the gambler and the venue should a gambler enter a venue AND gamble. IF for example a gambler enters a venue unimpeded and gambles, they should be able to report the venue for failing to stop them at the door and not have to pay any fine themselves. IF the venue reports that a gambler attempted to or did slip through door checks, enter a venue, gamble and was detected, then only the gambler should be fined - the venue should not have to pay a fine.

A one person - one card, no card - no play, precommitment smart card system would of course protect both the venue from prosecution for failing to stop the gamler AND the self-excuding gambler from their overwhelming impulse to play the machines. Unfortuantely, as yet their is no motivation on the part of venues to do anything to tighten up self-exclusion contracts - at the moment, only one party of a self-exclusion contract has any financial or legal obligations under it I fear your cause is in vain.

You may be correct in what you say, but unlike cane toads, the pokies have 'natural enemies' here in Australia - enemies that were once poisonned by the pokies pest and have evolved to be immune to their poison.

Time will tell who is the better clairvoyant - you or me. Kirner regrets pokies mistakes http: A number of members of Joan Kirner's Labor government in the early s have said that, with hindsight, they wished they had put tighter controls on the multi-billion-dollar industry.

Most of the former MPs said the introduction of pokies was inevitable and they did not regret changing the law to allow them. But almost half the former Cabinet members wished they had imposed stricter curbs, allowed fewer machines, and made better deals for sporting clubs and problem gamblers. A damning report released last week also showed pokies were damaging people's health, diverting money from the retail industry, and failing to boost tourism or sustain a jobs boom.

The machines, introduced at a time of financial hardship for the government, have since generated a river of gold. Former premier Joan Kirner said there should have been more analysis of the social impact of the machines before their introduction. Former attorney-general Jim Kennan said he believed the machines probably should have been restricted to clubs. And former minister Neil Pope said he regretted the decision, which was born out of financial hardship.

Former industry and economic planning minister David White, who led the introduction of the machines, continues to support them.

Now hired by pokies operator Tattersall's to assist their government relations, Mr White said most Victorians were better off because of the machines. The Government is now reviewing Victoria's licensing to decide who should be allowed to run poker machines.

Department of Justice secretary Penny Armytage will head the review, and former Department of Premier and Cabinet secretary Peter Kirby will conduct the community consultations -- a move criticised by anti-gambling bodies, who say he has too many ties to the Government.

Go to - http: In considering the impact of electronic gaming machines on employment we conclude the following: As a daily toker with celiac disease who has always defended marijuana, I have also begun to wonder the same thing my man.

Perhaps state governments would be keen on the revenue, but could it top the amount of revenue the DEA and other federal entities collect from seizing assets, etc? Maybe the increase in domestic growing makes weed a less profitable crop, meaning the intelligence community won't reap the black budget dollars from importing to the US that it used to. There's also the private prison complex whose profits would suffer greatly if weed were legalized everywhere; they depend on people using and selling this nearly benign but illegal substance to stuff our prisons.

All in all, there's a huge fucking gravy train that would take a significant blow under full legalization. But certainly worth deeper investigation when you see MSM pushing any narrative in unison. In case you didnt know weed isnt free.

Colorado is at 10 billion dollar revenue, you tell me how to make 10 billion by being unproductive and a "complete waste". Stoners have jobs too thats where they get money to buy weed. Just because your square ass is afraid of weed dont project your insecurities by generalizing an entire group of people with your shitty sources.

If anything you are a good example of being in the demographics of the brainwash controlled mass based on your information on weed. Yeah, the only negative effects I've seen on people is having their lives ruined by criminal records, fees, fines, lost jobs and jail. They can't sell you their drugs when they take away your cash, so they have to legalize it.

They will probably legalize prostitution as well. Look at all the money states like colorado are making through taxation of a huge market that operated illegally before. Critical mass has been achieved and the Overton window now includes being openly in support of using and profiteering from cannabis. I think in the end we'll get a regulatory system like alchohol. Once something is common knowledge among the masses, TPTB can no longer supress and spew propaganda our way in its regard.

So they make it seem like we're 'getting' something. They simply cannot put the jack back in the box. So, the push is here now, more than ever since MJ is even more mainstream. You dont understand how it works. There isnt a market dependent issue being a plant that is so easily growned. Please explain happy artificially wtf is that even suppose to mean. Do you meditate all day to reach euphoria?

Square ass fedora dont generalize something you have zero information on. I am not against legalization but it will make your opinions on things invalid and it will be used to discriminate against you will be exploited and controlled this way. Also if you didnt know there are many anti inflammatory and medicinal effects but consipracy tards like yourself probably doesnt believe in medicine either.

Hilldogs always been staunchly against it as well so this has never made sense to me. Low info voters smh. I think it's TPTB throwing us a bone, to keep the majority happy and stoned.

MJ may be less harmful than alcohol, opioid drugs, and meth, but it's still a mind altering substance. And 20 years later, there will a moral crisis when the negative effects of MJ become more widespread. Just like the moral crisis we are seeing with opioid medications and heroin. No one is throwing a bone, there have long been medical exemptions which are easy to get with a doctor visit. What negative effects are you talking about, also on what grounds do you have to compare weed to oxys and heroine?

Mind altering means its bad? You learn something, thats mind altering too. People have been smoking weed long before it has been made legal. I also dont recall there being a moral crisis whatever fuck thats suppose to mean in Holland where weed has been legal forever.

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy. By having a Reddit account, you can subscribe, vote, and comment on all your favorite Reddit content.

Sign up in just seconds. Already have an account? Log In Skip for now. Reddit is filled with interest based communities, offering something for everyone. Check out some communities and we recommend you subscribe to at least 5.

Your username is how other community members will see you. This name will be used to credit you for things you share on Reddit. What should we call you? Having a hard time picking a name? Here are some available suggestions. Log in or sign up in seconds.

Submit a new link. Submit a new text post. Bigoted slurs are not tolerated. No accusations of rules violations in comments. No stalking or trolling. Titles and comments with a large percentage of caps lock, bold text, large fonts or text colors are considered "shouting" and can be removed.

Facebook links will be removed. Other image posts are subject to removal at moderators discretion. Posting links in other subs pointing to specific submissions or comments here is subject to a ban, depending on context. Posts that attack this sub, users or mods thereof, will be removed. Accusing another user of being a troll or shill can be viewed as an attack, depending on context. First violations will usually result in a warning but bans are at the mods' discretion.

Misleading, fabricated or sensationalist headlines are subject to removal. Self posts that lack context or content may be removed. Send a message to conspiracy. Welcome to Reddit, the front page of the internet. Become a Redditor and subscribe to one of thousands of communities. This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment. Want to add to the discussion? Our bodies just happen to have thc receptors, without them, it would do nothing for us.

Smoking anything harms your lungs. No one mentioned lung cancer, and I don't like the idea of people putting words in my mouth. I think it's purely tax money. That's why it's been allowed to be legal. Good for a laugh. The best way to do this is to find a way to synthesize the molecule in some controlled process. Do this, and the pills that come off the assembly line will all be homogenous in purity and in the exact dosage each contains. Oddly, anti-pharma activists tend to see this as a negative, preferring instead to put their faith in a version which has not undergone any meaningful manufacturing control.

So the claim that Big Pharma doesn't sell natural products is false. It's equally false that they don't sell anything they can't patent. Obviously they prefer patented products that allow them to monopolize the market for a time, but this is not unique to the pharmaceutical industry. It's the standard business practice in every industry, even in the natural supplements industry, where a quick read of many pill bottles reveals that the formulation is patented.

And, of course, patents don't last forever. A huge segment of the pharmaceutical industry is devoted to the manufacture and sale of generics, or even just products like aspirin. The patent for aspirin expired during World War I, yet it remains a hugely profitable product, and is sold by virtually every Big Pharma company. It's one thing to believe conspiracy theories like all the world's leaders are reptilian aliens in electronic disguises, or the Air Force does experiments on captured aliens at Area 51, because those don't impact the lives of intelligent adults in the real world.

But the Big Pharma Conspiracy does. It suggests, enables, and encourages distrust of the medical profession. Obviously, that's bad for the public health. It drives people toward those alternative medicine practitioners whose professions may be free of conspiracy theories, but are unfortunately also free of effectiveness.

The Big Pharma Conspiracy also takes attention away from the real problems that exist within the pharmaceutical industry. When we invent an imaginary boogeyman as a placeholder because we're not familiar with what the real problems might be, we go forward with bad information and we lobby and we talk to our friends and we spread bad information. And then more people have a wrong understanding of the issues in the pharmaceutical industry. One of those is a problem with transparency of clinical trials.

Another is the inherent conflict of interest with drug manufacturers having to fund and oversee their own trials. But when more voters remain ignorant of these, and instead demand action on imaginary cancer cures being suppressed, everyone loses.

Most people die in a hospital, undergoing treatment for whatever their terminal condition is. Thus there will always be a temptation for those mistrustful of science to blame the medical treatment for the death, rather than the disease that was being treated. This is enough of a public relations conundrum for the medical industry, without additional layers of even more irrational paranoia and conspiracy mongering being stacked on top.

Use pharmaceutical drugs, or don't, that's up to you because it's doesn't affect anyone but you. But anti-pharma conspiracy mongering does affect other people; so please take the trouble to better inform yourself before going forth to spread it. Please contact us with any corrections or feedback. Skeptoid Media, 19 Sep Statista GmbH, 27 Mar.

Statista GmbH, 9 Mar. Science-Based Medicine, 22 Apr. Rights and reuse information.

Pokies Camel Toeing Meaning that you've got had

Despite their many contradictory claims, one constant about conspiracy theories regarding Big Pharma — or. The Big Pharma Conspiracy Popular claims of a Big Pharma Conspiracy don't stand up to any rational scrutiny. by Brian Dunning. Filed under Alternative Medicine. According to the Big Pharma conspiracy theory, the medical establishment in general and pharmaceutical companies in particular operate for sinister purposes and.

Pokies Wild Eggs Reviews

Top 10 CONSPIRACY Theories About MEDICINE