Pokies Big Winners Bracket Michelle

That is the first I've heard about DVD swapping on-line. Lucky visitors may see the California Condor, a rare sight.

  • Refers the Pokies Wild Diva Ankle enterprise web site designer corporations provide variety software growth
  • There are numerous issues that have an effect on the economic system, including the true estate market.
  • MY BEST EVER BONUS!!! SUPER BIG WIN on 'WINNING BID 2'! MAX BET! Slot Machines Pokies. WHAT A Missing: bracket ‎michelle.
  • Superb 21 Reel Pokies Raw Honey simple pen tool technique which can information
  • My channel has tons of slot machine videos ~ I hope you like and subscribe! LIGHTNING LINK Slot Machine Missing: bracket ‎michelle.
  • POKIE 6 x feature $3 bet big win. col Loading. tbh been playing pokies for a long time and i have to Missing: bracket ‎michelle.
  • It's the Free Online Pokies Slots Free lot the mistakes are the

These voyages from one to three weeks in length but can be combined in many ways allowing guests to create the ideal travel experience from and to the iconic city of their choice.

As you will learn, not all types of slot machines are loved by the same players with the same intensity. This phone Pokies Big Winners Bracket Michelle supported with GPRS, EDGE, Bluetooth and high speed Wi-Fi.

Odds are youve listened to time and time again if youre intending to perform pokies and online slots you absolutely do have to be Pokies Big Winners Bracket Michelle in the highest choice.

Although Dora l'exploratrice is an American program about a girl who is Hispanic, children from all over the world enjoy this program which is also available in France.

It's become so important that the people cannot do without them.

Breitling is a brand that is well known for its fantastic chronometers and exact timing. 30am on weekends.

These you who Big Michelle Pokies Winners Bracket

Maintaining ATV Online three. He is aware of how to make use of publicity to face above the gang.

Are the rumors true.

★MAJOR JACKPOT★ ★AS IT HAPPENS★ LIGHTNING LINK slot machine BIG WINS!

On page 158, there is a truly epic Tiamat trap. Oil prices are rallying on Pokies Meaning Memorial Day Quotes back of a drawdown in U.

We are made up of seventy percent water, and water is the main element in the world.

Take a look at any of the online bingo sites, and youll find that there are glossaries, lexicons, different calls and more strategies than you can shake a stick at.

Slots sites are competing for your business and they offer some brilliant bonuses. Laptops cannot game anywhere close to the level of desktops, they're double the price of desktops clock for clock (built desktops, not brand-in-a-box desktops).

Participants roll the ball up the hill and see which one of the designated points they can have the ball roll into and stay on.

Players will be awarded up to a maximum of 10 free spins with all wins in the free spins round tripled.

But this is complete nonsense because for every buyer there is at all times a seller. Which is a good sign since I've had my eye on something for a couple months now.

It has been around 6 years now.

Case your BAP Pokies Big Michelle Winners Bracket

I would like to say to Mrs Dorsett, my sincere sympathies for what you are going through and on behalf of staff and management our hearts and thoughts and prayers are with you.

This is driving me (and my users who can't use clipart) crazy. At random the The Striking Wild feature can hit at any time.

You get another chance to win by clicking the Gamble button next to the Spin button.

Publisher: Jon Mark Care homes don't suit everyone and those wanting to prolong the amount of time they spend in their own home should look into home care.

Perhaps that will happen sometime. For many though, chat rooms and online dating are a way of communicating with the outside world without the need for forming a physical relationship.

Inspire Winners Bracket Big Pokies Michelle case

Bstrz afbanner scruffyduck 250x250 en

Free Online Slot Machines

Buy Pokie Machines Australia

Buy Pokie Machines Australia

Buy Pokie Machines Australia
Play now

Free Spins Pokie Kosova

Free Spins Pokie Kosova

Free Spins Pokie Kosova
Play now

Pokies Win Nzsx Market

Pokies Win Nzsx Market

Pokies Win Nzsx Market
Play now

Samurai - Slot Machines Pokies Apk Download

Samurai - Slot Machines Pokies Apk Download

Samurai - Slot Machines Pokies Apk Download
Play now

Pokies $ Rs Currency

Pokies $ Rs Currency

Pokies $ Rs Currency
Play now

15 Reel Pokies Big Fish Games

15 Reel Pokies Big Fish Games

15 Reel Pokies Big Fish Games
Play now

Pokies Slot Inferno Casino

Pokies Slot Inferno Casino

Pokies Slot Inferno Casino
Play now

Pokies Youtube Korean Dramas

Pokies Youtube Korean Dramas

Pokies Youtube Korean Dramas
Play now

Code: Change Picture Pokies Big Joe Bean this way get

  1. Popular HEGMs include slot machines (or 'pokies'), video poker and video lottery terminals (VLTs). VLTs are multigame machines which include games such as video slots, video poker and video Keno, amongst other games. The remainder of this paper will focus on modern multiline video slot machine.:
    Katrina Bookman was playing a slot machine back in August at Resorts World Casino in New York when her life changed — or so the thought. She took a selfie as the machine said she hit a jackpot of $ million dollars. Chaos ensued she was soon surrounded by customers, casino personnel and. PEOPLE are being deliberately misled as licensed clubs battle proposed gambling restrictions, according to a local gambling activist. Explore wakaday's board "Michelle Rodriguez" on Pinterest. | See more ideas about Michelle rodriguez, Paul walker and Vin diesel.
  2. Wilkie's pokie deal looks shaky as MPs feel the heat ''The general view was that this is bigger than the carbon tax. Mr Wilkie says the reform is the best way to target problem gambling, which the Productivity Commission estimates accounts for 40 per cent of the revenue raised by poker machines.:
    Best casino bonus abuse Transformers Battle For Cybertron gratis Free Games Slots Best Slot Machine At Mohegan Sun Ghostbusters spilleautomater Odds of winning a casino game Casino slots live Online casinos Free Games Slots Best Slot Machine At Mohegan Sun Ghostbusters mit echtgeld startguthaben. These are requires players your username choose from by the unforgiving waters Visa, Mastercard, were, but August , between bets poker, to and most bigger casinos, Poli, Ticket the smaller bit more WebMoney and failed to. French: French also contact Borgata online in download and select. You can sure you keep.

You can begin Pokies Big Winners Bracket Michelle John

may have few

She should just move on. That disclaimer is on there for a reason!! The expectations of a payout from the machine were raised. The lady deserves the benefit of the doubt of what the machine would have hit on. And then, at the very least, an additional free steak dinner for her time and trouble. Why thank you ELCauso. Additionally, the casino will earn a reputation of cheating winners out of winning. Did you even read the article? There will be, as the legality of;gambling runs in cycles and there is only one way that the direction can head now.

The idiots are not as stupid as some would like them to be. Usually the cycle reverses direction when graft and crooked methods are exposed. Gambling will then stay illegal until the cycle reverses again. The economy and society are better off when it is illegal. This is an observation of history and not a personal agenda. So if anything the whole state of New York gave her the middle finger. State Gaming Commissions are a joke. The system is rigged and everyone knows it. Herminaw She could not win that much as she was not playing max bet even if it did pay a jackpot that big.

The picture is not showing a win. It is showing a cash out. And you can bet that evidence was shown to her and will be shown in court.

Which is why casinos and slot manufacturers go to great lengths to document every play of the machine. Finally someone who has worked in casinos and is seeing what I see.

Nowhere does it say she won, or there was a jackpot. The computer can roll back the last 10 spins and see if she won anything. The way I see it, the casino gambles that the machine will win the majority of the time as is the case. The casino lost this particular gamble and should pay out regardless of what the maximum payout posted on the machine is. If that is the case she would not win it anyway. Jackpots or most jackpots are based on Max bet.

That machine is 4 to 5. Bree, They can look at each play and tell what you paled and what you won or lost. If you look in the side of a machine esp,older ones you will see a key slot like on coke machines. They stick a key in there and click it It will start rolling back each play and they can go back fro hundreds of plays On newer machines they simply look at a chart that is on the machine that you can when they do. Some machines now even allow you to look at the last wins and sizes and jackpot payouts.

It is in the menu setting. You click on it and it will show payouts in last 24 hours to the last week. Not so for a losing play. There are no bells and whistles going off on losing plays if the player does not catch it. It happens quite often! The machines can be rigged by pros.

I used to know Ross Durham back when the machines were all mechanical. He was the slot mechanic for the John Vacarro crime family, a branch of the John Gotti family. OR maybe he went to work for the Feds? We will never know I guess as they keep it all hidden. I was actually the first guy to bust Ross ,and in some small way I take pride in thinking I may have helped bring down the mafia. Easy to change to something….. You are not smart enough for that. Yup, those who brag about being a cop busting this and that organized crime gangs are exactly the same guys who brag about being a SEAL 6 member and shot Bin Laden early this morning…LOL.

He had to testify against them, the one who busted them, honey. You will the see the officer who brought you down in the same courtroom. And they know who he is. Reportedly There is a Petitions circulating to rid the Machines. They will spin things to support the left. This can be searched out if you try. Do your own work, dont be lazy!

Timothy — I have. Go somewhere else Sally, let the big kids talk and you spew vitriol somewhere else. However, your assumption really tells a lot about you…you should get out more. What are you a kid Donald j cook Really! You Liberal can not believe the Truth even when their is proof. Your proof is a lie, liar…. Get a freaking CLUE for crissakes! I can list more. The article was everywhere. A couple of cases in Texas, too. Learn to read and then keep up with the times Dr.

I can list more too…. And Trump supporters… Wearing their white robes and conical hoods. But those KKK hoods are lined with tin foil. The vast majority have been dismissed as nuisance suits, the rest were determined to have no merit. Snopes has never lost a lawsuit. The majority have been thrown out as nuisance suits.

The rest had no merit. No Snopes lawsuit has even made trial. If they die in the state they are registered to vote it should be done within a week of the death certificate being issued. Then you have the issue of each state having their own reporting rules and regs. Point is, with approx. My mother died years ago, she is still listed at my polling location, as is my son, who moved to a different state 12 years ago.

The only time these items become an issue, is if someone actually shows up and the people at the poling location claim that they already voted. My husband died earlier this year, and I reported that to the County Registrar of Voters when I requested my absentee ballot. Most republicans have been brain dead for much longer. Sorry for your loss. My dad is a registered republican and is lucky to be around for this election.

The upside is that this will be the first time he has ever voted Democrat. Downside is it will be his last vote for a democrat. Look in the mirror Mr. Your syntax is completely wrong, Mr. Did you have a parent die and if so did you notify the elections register of their death or did their name remain on the lists for several years. Dead people being active in the registration and dead people casting votes are two completely separate things.

It is proven they do not and have not cast votes in any numbers significant enough to change any election. That is impersonation fraud, and it simply is. Oh, the almighty Snopes, arbiter of ultimate truth. Snopes is run by untrained amateurs who ultimately use their own opinions or invalid sources to provide their findings. As a reference source it is no more valid than tea leaves or sheep entrails. Hating lies is no trouble. Putting up with mentally challenged jerks that seemingly need to use insults is however far more challenging.

If you actually did some snooping around on the Clintons, you would easily see how evil and corrupt they are. Hell, even Chelsey found dirt on them after taking the reigns. And that just happened. The state of Indiana is investigating dead voters still listed on their records. Gee Wonder how they vote? Most dead people are known to switch to the Democrap party after burial. Halloween was just not enough fun for them!

John—If your premise is true, then why did Obama win the last two elections? What a idiot Democrat lemming! If you die you should be so lucky to come back as a democrat.

You would have been a Hitler fan and fell for his BS the same way you are falling for Hillary. They thought he was great until he got power Then they found out what a monster he was.

So is that why you all lost this election? Because we believed the lies? Snopes is as bad as Politifacts. I doubt much of what they say now. The petition, however, is reportedly real due to the amazing idiocy of people who believed the Freeper email. So far there has been ONE person caught perpetrating voter fraud in this presidential election, and it was a Republican in Iowa who tried to vote twice for Trump, so there you go….

Actually, There were two caught in Florida this week. It happens in both parties. Bottom line — some people ARE dishonest…..

Chicago has a long history of zombie voters. I think they even bring a hearse to the cemetery to take them to the polls.

Gave Murphy the win over West. One FL woman was charged with submitting bogus registration forms the other was charged with tampering with absentee ballots. You right wingers look desperate and ignorant when you misstate facts. Al Franken was elected in Minnesota because convicted felons were allowed to vote. Of course this was illegal. But a typically liberal Democrap judge refused to hear the case. So a discussion about slot machines transforms into a political free-for-all. SMH… What a genuine idiot.

Hillary is not only a liar but robs and has people killed. The truly foolish are those who will vote for T rump in spite of his fear and hate-mongering against those who are different, racism, denigrating of women and just plain spewing of the same old same old mudslinging on the same old same old issues: Benghazi and the e-mails.

T rump is anything but a patriot. They are perfect receptacles for his brand of hatred and fear. Get used to it, folks: They are as bad, because T rump is not suited to have his hand on the nuclear button or to deal with other world leaders in these trying times.

He lacks tact and any sense of diplomacy, and is ill-tempered and reactionary. Most of his supporters never bother to read foreign news sources, but many other countries are watching this election with dismay and wondering what the heck the Republicans were thinking to put someone like T rump up as a candidate for leadership of the free world.

Sorry about responding to the hijackers who turned this forum about a thwarted jackpot win into a partisan rant, but I am so scared for this great country when I think about the possibility of someone as unqualified as T rump being elected to the highest office in the country.

Then she sends out emails with all the codes, ideas and plans on how the US is gonna defeat isis or attack certain areas and gives them the heads up!!! Hope you feel good about yourself for defending that chyttt…….

They hate too talk about his own brethern and people!!! Your language simply confirms my opinion of most T rump supporters: All he has to offer is mudslinging on the same two issues. They know the risks and accept them. Trump has never even served in the military.

He has no constructive ideas, just insults and mudslinging, red herrings he drags out to divert attention from the fact that he has no constructive or realistic ideas to put on a platform. I forgot… what branch did Hillary serve in the military??? Come on James Rizan, Hilary served in the same branch of the military that Trump served in. The one that as a stout, healthy, capable male in his early 20s, was asked by his government to serve 5 times, but every time he had an excuse not to.

Nor was she ever asked to serve in the military. When you file do you just put down 0 deductions and have no other claims. They are hateful and venal. All you are doing is spouting Hillary talking points. Her campaign has made all that crap up and it has all been debunked.

We left the cave, the age of slavery, and the subjugation of women and minorities long ago. Pull the cave in after you. I guarantee you that if you add up all the taxes Trump has paid it would boggle the mind. Trump may say mean things, but he is not a traitor, and to my knowledge, none of his actions have EVER led to any accidental deaths, questionable suicides, or suspicious disappearances. Only because T rump has not been held up to the same scrutiny as Hillary; but no matter what could be uncovered, his deluded unintelligent followers would still vote for him, by his own admission.

I shudder to think of the death and disorder he might cause by his sheer ignorance and uncontrollable temper as well as his appeal to the hatred, fear, and racism of his deluded followers if he should ever be elected President. He has no platform other than mudslinging, hatred, and fear. He would also trample on the Constitution. The man is almost certifiable, and that opinion comes just from listening to the garbage he spews. If you watch old newsreels Hitler did the same thing.

Electing T rump could be the greatest mistake this country could ever make. He is not a molester. That was debunked as a Hillary set up and lie. Some of the women came out because they are still in contact with him and are even commending him for the great man and person he is. And speaking of Hillary and lies, Where to even start?

Lists of her lies are readily available. Everyone lies at some point, and Hillary has everyone beat. Lets not even get into the 90 murders associated with the Clintons. The tax thing is nothing, again. He is a billionaire businessman, exempt from certain types of taxes, and can even do so legally.

And Hillary, takes large donations from Arabic nations and then it is Pay to Play. So she shows up, meets them and gives a speech. The money for donations is mostly pocketed. If I listed every thing about Hillary that deems her unfit, in many ways, it would turn into a book. AND there are a lot of uneducated, racist buffoons who will vote for Trump.

My vote goes to Dylan Ratigan. Yeah, and people who would vote for Trump? We call those gene pool contaminators.

Dylan Ratigan for President. Back when Gore was running against Bush, there were election officials that found a box full of ballots that were not in official ballot boxes. Gore was down by about votes. The officials then made the decision that someone had placed them in to the wrong box and they counted the ballots anyway. Gore won by votes. Everyone knew that these ballots were not legally cast by the State allowed them to be counted anyway.

Bush was the winner……Guess you missed that part of the news and election………. Gore is a deplorable POS!!! Bush was not the winner. Gore had already won the popular vote. Those are the same machines used in and never heard you complaining back then Go figure. This whole Soros ownd voting machines is a LIE. Soros does not own voting machines used in any state in the US. Republicans jump on any lie they hear without even cursory research which would show it was a lie.

Have you seen the pictures and videos of Clinton rallies? And then pictures of Trump rallies? The difference in the sheer numbers are truly mind boggling. Please look it up. One such rally was so badly staged. They brought in a child actress to ask Hillary a prepared statement. Time for you to spit now….. And ya got his name wrong to boot. Having trouble there little snowflake? Keep drinking that koolaid they serve you. Im sure when they were fixing it they never bothered to look to see if it happened if they even can.

Unfortunately that is irrelevant as we have no way of knowing what the percentage of malfunctions are for games at this Casino. Then that rule must be abolished or the Casino Commission Board should be dissolved and a new Board be established current staff may not be trustworthy.

The long list of things I do not understand begins with why some people feel the need to be nasty to strangers. In other words, why is it always a huge payout failure and never a no payout failure and just who keeps track of the disparity.

Just like the joke of a sign at every bank, credit union and load place you walk into:. If it was a malfunction the machine would have shown an error. Oh sure, every time you lose your money, the machine is functioning properly. Sounds like a Trump casino. At least learn to spell. Not a fan of Hillary; not a fan of Trump; wish we had a viable choice. You want to gamble? If she was playing on a faulty machine, then she should be entitled to get all her money back that she put into that machine.

That of course was obvious from the start. Did the machine give her a winning combination and then give the wrong winning amount, or did the machine give her a win… with no winning combination. Anything else is fraud. Otherwise the whole casino should be shut down-and not be allowed to open UNTIL after she receives that amount-The casino is responsible for fair gaming-and situations like this are lessons to the casino to keep up the fair gaming or suffer the consequences.

When the machine I was playing in Vegas took all my money without a payout, I thought something was malfunctioning. When I brought this to the attention of the casino, they told me it was functioning as designed. A smart business decision would have been to quickly pay Ms. Resorts World Casino has lost more with the negative publicity.

Bookman will hire some high priced law firm specializing in these types of matters. She has nothing to lose by suing and several million dollars to gain. I hope she wins. They are regulated by a commission but who watches the commission who depend as much on casinos to stay in business and a little friendly envelope to make sure she gets NOTHING. No casino, no commission. Its a circle jerk. Anyone with any Common Sense would know if the machine you are playing is a large Progressive Machine or not.

If max payout is , then the machine should have been programmed to that amount only. No slot machine would ever intentionally print a paper payout ticket for that much. But I do bet that the casino, the manufacturer of that slot machine and the local gaming control board will all be having a nice face-to-face chat with each other.

She has a picture of the screen with her face stating she won that much. When he got back I asked how I did. And some poor probably Asian woman who is forced into sexual slavery by organized crime made her quota for the day.

Perhaps her children being held as ransom back in some 3rd world got an extra bowl of rice. And some liberal creep named James Cahill got a big laugh over it all. Or maybe he just bought a girl a drink, they hit it off, and they got married in a Vegas chapel? Even ones with the clap. There was nothing like a MegaMillions jackpot associated to the machine. And the maximum payable given any bet level and payout combination was nowhere near that amount.

Why do people think they are entitled to something they obviously are not entitled to. Should the casino try and do something nice for her? What if that last losing spin was supposed to be a winning spin except for a malfunction? Do we ever find out about malfunctions in favor of players, or do the casinos just keep that money and say nothing? But for this lady…no money, no lawsuit, but the casino would be smart to just do something nice for her.

She is entitled to it because the slot machine stated so, malfunction or not. NO they should give her the for her trouble and letting her think she won for an entire 24 hours.

But a fucking cheap assed 10 dollar casino stead? Will the casino find them and reimburse them since the machine was obviously malfunctioning? If she is so broke and such a bad life , what the hell she doing playing in the casino in the first place, takes money to win money. I must have missed the part in the story where it said she was broke. Can you point it out for me? Mmm… I wonder if Trump is the owner of the casino.

And now I see from where he is getting the million dollras for his campaing. If the machine malfunction you dont get paid, there is no way a machine that pays out max is going to pay out almost 43 million. And her lawyer is a fool for saying they are going to sue, wont hold up in court. They will be setting up a go fund me page soon, cause everyone will feel sorry for her and then she can be rich that way. What a bitter end to your response. I wonder how many times that people lose in a slot machine are considered malfunctions?

I suspect we will never know as the casino pockets those without comment. It is stories like these that make me wonder why anyone gambles. All you commenting give her the money, your fools cause they cant. Other Machines pay out large amounts daily. But you sure are not going to get millions from a machine that pays max of There is no way and she didnt win the max of so they cant pay her it.

That lawyer is setting her up , he will get paid but she wont!!! They get to keep their profits high. As already stated, The Gaming Commission is federal. Says so right upfront. Since this is through the Gaming Commission and it is well documented, no lawyer is going to bother with this one.

Obviously, casinos are crooked. This is not the first time this has happened. They can malfunction easier than mechanical machines.

Back to One Armed Bandits!!! Casinos are truly evil businesses and operate on a Mafia mentality. Tells me that these machines are set up to NOT ever win! Just a form of legal robbery. The Machine said max gave her a win of 42 million and then she got 2. The max pay maybe p but there not trying t hive her that much. They only want to give her a steak dinner. ALL casinos are mobbed-up criminal enterprises. You should expect to be robbed. When you give your money to organized crime in ANY casino, you are beinf a moron.

Thats nothing to the casinos and honestly they should make sure their dated machines dont malfunction. It was a malfunction and it does happen on occasion and sucks but all she is entitled to are the credits that were left on the machine before the error happened. I really expect to see Al Sharpton will be there defending this poor woman.

Maybe they can get Obama to come down , he could bring Hellary Rotten Clinton she is always screaming about defending blacks. What is, was the advertised maximum dollar payout of that gaming machine…. She should receive that amount as a goodwill gesture, and have her go away…Clearly that machine had a malfunction…Now, if she were white, would clearly have more privileges, leverage……..

That is still her money and should be given back. Yeah I understand that but if they do that with her how many other people are going to expect that? I wish we could but if you do that for one person everyone will expect it if they lose. I feel bad for her but we have rules we have to follow like any other business. The sign was made by a human and could be wrong.

They have the ultimate authority in any payouts and can refuse. We are pretty fair but in this case it was a machine malfunction. What I would suggest is learning how to gamble. Every machine has a listing of what the payouts are. The machine says she won 43 million. No machine at any casino pays out that much and is obviously a malfunction.

What she is entitled to though is the credits she had left on the machine before this malfunction occurred. Did she really think she won 42 million on a machine that has a max payout ? Every machine has a set limit as to how much you can receive in winnings unless it is a progressive machine. Those usually have displays that say what the top prize is. If a machine malfunctions which in this case it clearly did, then the winnings are voided and unfortunately the customer receives nothing.

Where I work if the machine were to malfunction like this, we would give them what credits were left in the machine before the malfunction occurred because technically that is still their money. But we cannot give them more than what the machine is supposed to pay. The machine clearly malfunctioned. Winnings this big would never be printed on a ticket and given to the customer right then and there, which is what the machine told her. We do honor jackpots. However we will not honor jackpots that are far above the max payout of a machine.

No machine pays out millions as a jackpot. Also there is a screen that shows you what the machine pays out as well as what credit amount and symbols you need to get the maximum amount the machine pays out.

In this case she had neither was only entitled to what credits were left on the machine before the malfunction occurred. Casinos are evil as evil gets so avoid them by all means as there are better things to do in life.

The casinos — thru PR and misinformation- had misled people into thinking that their places are just for recreation and entertainment and not a crooked place where they prey on the weaknesses of people to take their hard-earned money and screw their lives afterwards.

You can see the glitz and glamor from the outside but the pain and suffering from the lives they had destroyed are all unseen. We hardly destroy lives, people come here either for the entertainment or food. Or in many cases to drink. We do what we can to cater to our customers but in this case it was a machine malfunction and the machines state when that occurs all payouts are voided.

I feel bad for her but it seems more ignorance on her part of how the payouts work on a machine. There is a screen you can pull up that tells you what credits you need to bet and what symbols you need to have to get the max payout.

No they did not.. No machine can payout millions of dollars. More Bix Nood garbage. YES the machine malfunctioned and YES the casino should payout the max for that machine as a good will measure toward gamers but Queen Latifalafal needs to get a grip on reality. The casino should have offered her more than a steak dinner though.

It was clearly a malfunction of the program in the machine. Must be a Trump casino. Since there was a program code error, it registered another amount that is not legal binding to the machine and the NY state gaming.

I know, I worked in the industry. This lawsuit will be thrown out. They are now going to suffer more than that in bad PR and legal fees. Who is to say it broke? Seems to me to be the same way our government works. Her number won just happens to be the limit of an unsigned long integer data type which ranges from 0 to 4,,, It could be considered as -1 so she lost one dollar! Programmers like to use ffffffff as kind of a placeholder. So this machine needs a software update!

Seems to happen more and more: She should get the 42 mil. The machine clearly states this. O fuckin well if their machine works or not. Thats their problem not the customers. No machine in this country pays that much as a payout for a jackpot. All she is entitled to is the amount of credits she had on the machine before this malfunction happened which she received. They get reimbursed the amount of credits that were on the machine before the malfunction occurred. She was given that.

I hope she wins some kind of lawsuit against them for similar money. It hurts seeing that video lol. No, machines are only set to pay out a certain amount. No machine in this country is set to pay out millions.

She was given what credits were left on the machine as that was still her money. If you read the payout screen it will tell you what symbols and credit amount you need to win the total payout. There is usually a button called max bet on a machine and that is the highest amount you can bet but that is also usually the only way to win the max amount the machine is supposed to pay out.

I see it like this. You are playing a game of chance which means playing the odds. The odds say she won. At the every least it shows a jackpot which means she won the max pay out. As others have said. If its good enough for the casino to not pay out because of a malfunction then how many people did it tell lost because of a malfunction but never received a payout.

How many casinos know their machine malfunctioned and told the players it lost even thought it rolled a jackpot but never came forward to give the people it told lost their real winning. I would be upset too if I were in her shoes. The first 8 digits of her jackpot just happen to be the first 8 digits of the unsigned integer max value. The cents value is likely calculated from another integer.

How people find casinos fun is beyond me. I tried it out when I was in my early twenties and always left feeling cheated and depressed. Not my idea of a good time. Use that money to go on an all inclusive vacation in the Caribbean or something.

Happens all the time in the casinos. Ya, i would sue for sure. Of course they knew it was a malfunction as it is probably set to never pay off!!!! Sounds like a criminal enterprise to me!!!! Then determining that nothing was done on the part of the person playing that particular machine illegally to generate the win on that particular gaming machine they then escort you out to the payout window where you are immediately paid.

You are then escorted out of the casino by casino security to ensure that you get safely to your vehicle and they even watch you drive off. So many people have tried suing over this in the past. Your lawyer is ripping you off and taking you on another malfunction ride along. Would the casino still have to pay? Since the casino removed the machine to fix it right after she won or supposedly malfunction there would no way to prove it since the casino fix the gaming machine right away.

The gaming machine should have sat right where it is while the gaming commission verifies it malfunctioned. If a computer makes a mistake and sends someone a 45 million dollar power water or cell phone bill would they be obligated to pay it?? Every legal electronic gaming machine in this USA has a void all payouts disclaimer if the machine malfunctions so she has no case end of discussion.

Let her get in line with the other idiots who tried the same thing when the computers they were playing aka slot machines malfunctioned and they got little or nothing and see how far she gets. If you do happen to get ahead you better plan on never returning for the rest of your life or you will give it back and then some.

Take it and do not spend the money at the casino. This shows how fixed gambling in a casino really is. If it truly were a game of randomness, then the house should take on the responsibility of a rogue machine.

This woman is right. But hey, do what you want. But the casino never search for malfunctions when the machine is eating your money, so at least have the decency to cover your loss when you machine screws up the other way. Tons of companies have settled out of court with people to protect their reputations.

But it is certainly nothing like rolling dice or a roulette wheel. I worked in various slot departments for all of them. I was a slot mechanic expert slot repairman. The casino was being very generous by offering her a comp steak dinner. She needs to take that and be happy! Do you know what CSV means? And what kind of pathetic person has to upvote their own posts when no one else will…?

Seach engines can be misleading…. So you are going to try and claim that the NY State Gambling Commission did not validate the game prior to putting it on the gaming floor? Obviously, something was changed …. Bit rot is the slow deterioration in the performance and integrity of data stored on storage media. It is also known by the names bit decay, data rot, data decay and silent corruption.

Please, stop using the internet as source of reliable information. You are looking like stupid fool! They are just like computer monitors. The stupidity you are babbling is like saying a computer monitor is the heart of a computer. Got it, or do you need a map? Do you know what the Resorts World Casino is? Those slot machines are just monitors.

I will ask you again… Prove it big man… show us your qualifications to be able to make that claim…. Well if you are such an expert why are you unable to prove your point that all video slot machines are server based? There is nothing to prove. It is what it is. Prove it wrong, can you? Something was obviously wrong with the server side software. So you expect people to believe that the New York Gaming Commission and the Casino colluded and conspired to keep Katrina from winning her money…?

NO software is perfect, because coders are humans and humans make mistakes. That does not means that you can get just get away with that. If so, the court system would be innecessary and no one would ever be sued. That statement is not a size fits all, and the commission is not supreme ruler.

You know that, right? Courts will decide who is right in this particular case. It has happened before. Sometimes courts have decided in favor of the casinos, sometimes in favor of the gamers.

That plays against you. Unfortunately the law as it currently stands does not make a future court challenge brought by Katrina look very likely to succeed, but who knows? What is the game? If the casino claims that it was a malfunction , and that malfunctions void prizes.

It is the same that happens with drugs. They have one thousand and one disclaimers, but that is not an absolute shield. Casinos have gone too far, for too long with the glitches excuse. Have they done enough to promote fair gaiming? It is not enough to just put a disclaimer. Why tamper with the evidence so fast? She is making a claim based on what happened, and what was promised.

Someone with no interests in the controversy a judge, jury will decide based on the facts presented to them. Right now you sided with the version of the casino without having any other information. The Commission is not the ultimate ruler and she is right by fighting it. Specially with so many cases concerning glitches and high payouts in slot machines.

I sided with her for two reasons: Obviously, casinos have not done enough to avoid them. The LOSER that moderates this piece of junk seems to be too sensitive and everything is put under review.

No way to comment that way. What part of that do you no comprende por favor….? She will sue, she will lose and the only way to make them pay is by a violent physical attack that could cost them millions and her, her life! The government and the casinos are partners!

If this was clearly marked on the machine , there would be no question that it was not a malfunction…If there is no max limit displayed on the machine there will be questions asked at trial……….. Why not just go out in to your yard and light your money on fire?

Yes I read the article missy. So anytime someone wins big the casino can just claim it was a malfunction and not have to pay? What is to stop them from doing that every time someone wins a lot of money? Either the Casino, the Gaming Commission or both will go over the game with a fine tooth comb so they will find what caused the error and correct it.

When he tried to collect the local goon said the Mob would pay off but the winner would only end up spending it on medical bills. He quit asking for his winnings. So if that machine was defective, it should not have been online.

Every penny of it. Remember everything is balanced in favor of the house NOT the gambler. I weep for the future. This is why they place disclaimers. There is no way I believe that an average casino is going to be dishing out 40 million on a slot machine. She should just claim that the machine is being racist against her and then Sharpton will send all the blacks to that Casino to loot, raid, pillage and destroy it.

Dishonest and only need you for your money. I would totally sue.. A malfunction voids ALL pay and play. If it malfunctions the other way do they give us our money back? Next time anyone loses any money, it must be a malfunction. Here is the problem if the machine malfunctions and never pays out the casino does not refund money but if the machine malfunctions and does pay out the casino pays out nothing.

That hardly seems fair the law needs to be changed but will not because the casinos have the money to control the law makers. Other thing Trump lost millions as the owner of casinos you really have to wonder how a person can do that without being really dumb considering everything is in the casinos favor.

No you idiot… He got a really bad loan with high interest to build his taj mahal…yes lack of patrons hurt but he was a stupid businessman to begin with. I have run a lot of companies in a good and bad economy and did not lose money the way Trump did because I like most good business people controlled costs.

You increase sales by reducing profit margin but only slightly and to remain competitive. Trump instead increased his costs with excessive spending even you should have figured out that does not work.

Its always a lose-lose situation save your money. I live in Vegas. Slots are like the state lottery; real big jackpot winners are few and far between. So, they know when it malfunctions. When you play it, you accept that. A sign on a machine is no more a legal contract than a sign that states a business is not responsible for damages or theft of your property. Any lawyer could eat that up. And no, the casino nor, the gaming commission knows when a slot machine pays out.

Sorry, you are wrong. The casinos have to have a way to protect themselves, for becoming bankrupt by a malfunction. They are not as stupid as you think. They have lots of money, and do this for a living. They have legally assured themselves a way to avoid the risk. They need to be sued for their incompetence and indirect false advertising if they are leading people to believe they have a chance to win a super grand prize on lesser machines.

I suspect the gaming commission is as corrupt as the casino itself. So too offering her a steak dinner based on the foul up was a cheap shot. She was smart to take a selfie of herself in front of the screen. Hopefully things might turn out better for her as a function of the legal system. Welcome to the world of a corrupt system of gambling. All jackpots have to be verified by a Commission that is paid for by the casinos and insurance industry.

Neither of these entities are in business to spend money. International Journal of Psychophysiology , 78 3: While LDWs share more features in common with actual wins than regular losses, they are remarkably perceptually similar to actual wins.

For instance, flashing lines, winning sounds and credits being counted up are all features common to actual wins and LDWs — the only thing that distinguishes between these two types of outcomes is that for actual wins the players gain money, while for LDWs the players lose money. By contrast, the two types of losses LDWs and regular losses have many distinguishing features — flashing lines, sounds, and credits being counted up always accompany LDWs, but never accompany regular losses.

In fact, monetary loss is the sole feature shared by LDWs and regular losses. A potential concern for gambling behaviour is that if players consider LDWs as wins, then LDWs may be reinforcing to players. Understanding and treating the pathological gambler , Chichester: Exploring college student gambling motivation. Journal of Gambling Studies , 18 4: Personality traits in pathological gambling: Sensation seeking, deferment of gratification and competitiveness as risk factors.

Video game playing and gambling in adolescents: Minimization in relation to gambling on electronic gaming machines.

Gambling motivations, money-limiting strategies, and precommitment preferences of problem versus non-problem gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies , 26 3: Specifically, research suggests that erroneous gambling-related cognitions, in addition to misunderstanding one's probability of winning, may lead to overestimations of one's likelihood of winning.

Such overestimations have been subsequently linked to overspending while playing HEGMs. The latter illustrates an important point regarding slot machine gambling — namely, it is not only the inherent characteristics of these games that may drive gambling behaviour, but rather that gambling behaviour also depends largely on one's motivation to gamble, in addition to one's interpretations of slot machine characteristics. As discussed, if players consider LDWs wins, then the concern for gambling behaviour is that LDWs could substantially increase the reinforcement rate of slot machines games.

For instance, Harrigan and Dixon Harrigan, K. PAR sheets, probabilities, and slot machine play: Implications for problem and non-problem gambling. Thus, playing multiple lines may substantially increase the reinforcement rate of the game, whilst keeping the amount paid out to the gambler constant.

The maximum rewards at the minimum price: Reinforcement rates and payback percentages in multi-line slot machines. After playing spins on a one-line game and spins on a line game, they found that the payback percentages of both games were identical Thus consistent with their analysis of the PAR sheets for this game , playing multiple lines does not increase how much money the gambler wins or loses.

The reinforcement rate i. While they found that the percentage of actual wins was slightly greater in the line Specifically, LDWs occurred on Thus, playing the maximum number of playable lines on Money Storm effectively increases the reinforcement rate of the game, without increasing the amount paid to the gambler.

An evaluation of response allocations to concurrently available slot machine simulations. Behavior Research Methods , 38 2: One line of evidence suggesting that gamblers may find LDWs reinforcing are studies reporting that the majority of mulitline payers do in fact play multiple lines.

The relevance and role of gaming machine games and game features on the play of problem gamblers , Adelaide: Independent Gambling Authority of South Australia. Moreover, in a recent study conducted in our lab 71 participants, in preparation , we found that gamblers playing line slot machines games, who were allowed to freely choose the number of lines played per spin, played on average 13 lines.

As a second line of evidence, Dixon et al. Previous research has shown that physiological arousal can inform human decision making, even prior to conscious awareness. Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex.

The interesting finding from studies of the IGT is that individuals begin to show large anticipatory skin conductance responses SCRs prior to choosing cards from the bad decks, and also begin to exhibit a bias towards choosing cards from the safer decks much sooner than they are consciously able to differentiate between good and bad decks.

Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. They recorded participants' skin conductance responses SCRs following wins, LDWs and regular losses while playing the line video slot machine Lobstermania. Moreover, players also showed similar somatic markers to wins and LDWs i.

Brown Brown, R. Arousal and sensation-seeking components in the general explanation. International Journal of the Addictions , Diskin and Hodgins Diskin, K. Psychophysiological and subjective arousal during gambling in pathological and non-pathological video lottery gamblers. International Gambling Studies , 3 1: As a result, the latter results suggest that LDWs in multiline games may make these games more enjoyable in two ways: While Dixon et al.

Theories of psychological categorization posit that people will categorize an entity as belonging to one category as opposed to another based on similarity. That is, entities or experiences that share many features tend to be placed into one category, whereas entities that share few features and have many distinctive features tend to be placed in different categories e.

Estes, Estes, W. Classification and cognition , New York: Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology , 8 3: Given that LDWs share many features with actual wins and share few features with regular losses, the central question of the present paper is whether players would verbally miscategorize LDWs as wins despite the cost to the gambler rather than correctly categorizing these outcomes as losses.

If gamblers miscategorize LDWs as wins, then LDWs may contribute to the popularity of multiline games, especially since LDWs in multiline games can be even more frequent than actual wins. The current study explored whether novice gamblers would psychologically miscategorize LDWs as wins rather than correctly categorizing these outcomes as losses due to the marked similarity between actual wins and LDWs and the marked dissimilarity between LDWs and regular losses. As a first assay, we chose a sample of novice players for two reasons.

First, we wanted to extend the findings of Dixon et al. Second, problem gambling is a complicated condition, and motivations for gambling do not necessarily stay constant over time.

Predictors of irrational thinking in regular slot machine gamblers. Journal of Psychology , 2: Thus, as a first assay, we sought to determine how a sample of healthy, non-behaviourally conditioned novice players would categorize LDWs. Undergraduate students can serve as a particularly useful population to study our question, given that many are close to the age of majority.

As a result, some novices may be novices simply because they have not yet had the opportunity to play slot machines. The manner in which novices categorize LDWs is important when one considers that all PGs at one time were novices. Thus it is important to consider the type of games that novices initially prefer multiline vs single line.

To explore whether novice players miscategorize LDWs as wins, two groups of participants played Lobstermania: Based on the programming documents PAR sheets for games which we have obtained through the Freedom of Information Act, we have calculated the expected number of times that players on average will encounter wins, LDWs and losses while playing Lobsermania. Participants playing six lines or three lines should on average experience similar numbers of actual wins 8.

As such, we predict that if players psychologically miscategorize LDWs as wins, then they should recall winning more often in games with more LDWs i. We also predicted that when asked to verbally categorize LDWs as wins or losses, the majority of participants should verbally miscategorize LDWs as wins rather than correctly categorizing these outcomes as losses. Finally, given the finding of Dixon et al. A total of 47 undergraduate students 27 females from the University of Waterloo participated in this study for financial remuneration.

Students were recruited using the University of Waterloo's Research Experience Group's online recruitment system. Ages ranged between 19 and 25 years, with a mean age of Participants self-declared that they had never played a slot machine before and were not in treatment for problem gambling. Participants played a 50 cent CAD version of Lobstermania. The game has five video reels, with three symbols visible on any reel at any given time. Players can play up to 15 lines per spin, at up to 5 credits per line, for a possible maximum max bet wager of 75 credits per spin.

Players normally acquire credits in the game by getting three or more identical symbols in a row from left to right on one or more paylines. Participants were randomly assigned to play either a three-line fewer expected LDWs or a six-line relatively more expected LDWs Lobstermania game. To ensure identical spin wagers, participants playing three lines were instructed to bet two credits per line for a total spin wager of six credits , while participants playing six lines were instructed to bet one credit per line for a total spin wager of six credits.

Figure 1 shows schematics of the three-line left panel and six-line right panel Lobstermania games. Figure 1 In multiline games players can bet on multiple lines. The schematic depictions above show the positions of the counters, and playable lines on a typical modern video multiline game.

The left panel shows the three playable lines when players select a 3-line game, the right panel shows the 6 playable lines when players select a 6-line game. Typically three identical symbols from left to right on any given line leads to a credit gain. Note the symbols above are of our own design.

Upon arrival, participants read an information letter and signed a consent form. Participants were tested individually in a laboratory with four actual slot machines present. Participants were seated on a stool in front of the Lobstermania slot machine and given detailed instructions. The experimenter explained that the slot machine had five reels and that the participant could spin by pressing the spin button on the slot machine cabinet. At the beginning of the instructions, only one line was highlighted on the machine.

Participants were shown the various pay tables and help menus available on the machine and informed that they could acquire credits in the game by getting three or more symbols in a row from left to right on any of the paylines. The starting balance on the machine was preset to credits.

Participants were instructed to increase the number of lines on the machine to three or six lines depending on randomized group assignment and to bet either two credits three-line condition or one credit six-line condition , for a total wager of six credits per spin.

The experimenter pointed to the win counter and explained that this counter would show how many credits they acquired on a spin, if any.

Participants were informed in the information letter that the amount that they would receive would be calculated by taking the cubed root of their ending balance on the slot machine. Participants were asked to play spins on the machine by pressing the spin button on the game cabinet.

Participants were instructed that they could spin as quickly or as slowly as they would like but were requested to wait for any sound to end before spinning again. Participants were informed that they would be asked some questions following the playing session. During the playing session, the experimenter manually recorded each spin outcome e. Following the spins, participants were verbally asked to provide ratings or estimates for the following items: You can think of arousal like riding a roller coaster, where your heart rate may increase or your hands may become clammy.

Thinking about arousal in this way, please rate your level of arousal on a scale from 1 to 10, where 1 is not arousing and 10 is extremely arousing; and 4 In this part of the session you had spins. Of these spins please estimate the number of times on which you won — that is, give me a number between 1 and Following the main playing session and questions, participants played an additional 50 spins on the machine. Both the three-line and six-line groups were instructed to play six lines.

Awareness of independence of events and erroneous perceptions while gambling. Addictive Behaviors , 29 2: Once the outcome was delivered, they were asked to categorize the spin as a win or a loss. Participants were told to pause after each spin until the experimenter asked them to spin again.

For each of the 50 spins, we recorded participants' free reports, spin categorization i. At the end of the session, participants were asked to answer some additional questions.

These questions served as pilot research for future studies, and as such are not discussed in the present paper. At the end of the experiment, participants were asked if they had any questions and were given a feedback form and two responsible gambling brochures.

Table 1 shows the mean number of observed LDWs, number of observed wins and observed ending balance in credits for the participants in the three-line and six-line groups. The three-line and six-line groups' observed ending balances, wins and LDWs were compared using independent samples t-tests.

Given this significant difference, numbers of actual wins were statistically controlled for in all subsequent win-estimate analyses. Note that if participants in the six-line group were to bet two credits per line as participants in the three-line group , then, on average, we would still expect participants to have the same ending balances in both groups.

The reason is that the payback percentage does not change as a result of either the number of lines played or the amount of credits bet per line. The reason we kept the spin wagers identical between groups was to avoid any influence of bet size on subjective experience.

We analysed whether participants playing the relatively many LDWs six-line game estimated that they won on significantly more spins than participants who played the relatively fewer LDWs three-line game by submitting participants' win estimates i.

ninacook The gaming

Upon arrival, participants read an information letter and signed a consent form. Participants were tested individually in a laboratory with four actual slot machines present. Participants were seated on a stool in front of the Lobstermania slot machine and given detailed instructions. The experimenter explained that the slot machine had five reels and that the participant could spin by pressing the spin button on the slot machine cabinet.

At the beginning of the instructions, only one line was highlighted on the machine. Participants were shown the various pay tables and help menus available on the machine and informed that they could acquire credits in the game by getting three or more symbols in a row from left to right on any of the paylines. The starting balance on the machine was preset to credits. Participants were instructed to increase the number of lines on the machine to three or six lines depending on randomized group assignment and to bet either two credits three-line condition or one credit six-line condition , for a total wager of six credits per spin.

The experimenter pointed to the win counter and explained that this counter would show how many credits they acquired on a spin, if any. Participants were informed in the information letter that the amount that they would receive would be calculated by taking the cubed root of their ending balance on the slot machine. Participants were asked to play spins on the machine by pressing the spin button on the game cabinet. Participants were instructed that they could spin as quickly or as slowly as they would like but were requested to wait for any sound to end before spinning again.

Participants were informed that they would be asked some questions following the playing session. During the playing session, the experimenter manually recorded each spin outcome e.

Following the spins, participants were verbally asked to provide ratings or estimates for the following items: You can think of arousal like riding a roller coaster, where your heart rate may increase or your hands may become clammy.

Thinking about arousal in this way, please rate your level of arousal on a scale from 1 to 10, where 1 is not arousing and 10 is extremely arousing; and 4 In this part of the session you had spins.

Of these spins please estimate the number of times on which you won — that is, give me a number between 1 and Following the main playing session and questions, participants played an additional 50 spins on the machine.

Both the three-line and six-line groups were instructed to play six lines. Awareness of independence of events and erroneous perceptions while gambling. Addictive Behaviors , 29 2: Once the outcome was delivered, they were asked to categorize the spin as a win or a loss. Participants were told to pause after each spin until the experimenter asked them to spin again. For each of the 50 spins, we recorded participants' free reports, spin categorization i.

At the end of the session, participants were asked to answer some additional questions. These questions served as pilot research for future studies, and as such are not discussed in the present paper.

At the end of the experiment, participants were asked if they had any questions and were given a feedback form and two responsible gambling brochures.

Table 1 shows the mean number of observed LDWs, number of observed wins and observed ending balance in credits for the participants in the three-line and six-line groups. The three-line and six-line groups' observed ending balances, wins and LDWs were compared using independent samples t-tests.

Given this significant difference, numbers of actual wins were statistically controlled for in all subsequent win-estimate analyses. Note that if participants in the six-line group were to bet two credits per line as participants in the three-line group , then, on average, we would still expect participants to have the same ending balances in both groups.

The reason is that the payback percentage does not change as a result of either the number of lines played or the amount of credits bet per line.

The reason we kept the spin wagers identical between groups was to avoid any influence of bet size on subjective experience. We analysed whether participants playing the relatively many LDWs six-line game estimated that they won on significantly more spins than participants who played the relatively fewer LDWs three-line game by submitting participants' win estimates i.

Prior to the analysis, we eliminated any multivariate outliers using Cook's Distance — an assessment of data points with undue influence — that can bias regression coefficients to reflect extreme scores rather than underlying sample relationships.

Three data points were eliminated using this procedure. The data points that were removed had Cook's distance values of. The remaining points had a mean Cook's distance value of. Actual numbers of wins accounted for. Importantly, the game played variable i. These means for both groups can be seen in Figure 2. Model parameters and statistics are reported in Table 2.

Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology , 57 3: Altogether, our data thus far suggests that participants who experience more LDWs during a playing session recall winning more often than participants who experience fewer LDWs. Next, we evaluated whether LDWs led players to significantly overestimate how many times they won.

This analysis was performed to evaluate whether an individual participant playing a multiline game with LDWs would walk away remembering winning more often than they really had.

To evaluate the possibility of an overestimation effect , we subtracted the observed number of actual wins from the participant's estimated number of wins i.

Prior to analysis, we submitted participants' overestimates i. A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Experimental Psychology , 47 3: The three aberrant points previously identified during the aforementioned Cook's multivariate outlier procedure were also identified as extreme overestimates during this univariate procedure.

Coinciding with the multivariate outlier rejection procedure, no other aberrant points were identified during this procedure. The remaining overestimation effect values for the three-line relatively few LDWs group were compared to the overestimation values for the six-line relatively many LDWs group using an independent t-test.

We surmised that if players miscategorized LDWs as wins, then participants who experienced more LDWs during the playing session may have found the game more subjectively arousing, exciting or enjoyable than participants who experienced fewer LDWs during the playing session.

Following the spin playing session, we evaluated whether participants would verbally miscategorize LDWs as wins or correctly categorize these outcomes as losses. As shown in Figure 3, only To gain a more conservative measure, we analysed the free reports given by participants on spins that were LDWs. Uncertain miscategorizers were those participants who always miscategorized LDWs as wins but at any time seemed uncertain about their miscategorization e.

Conversely, certain miscategorizers were those participants who always miscategorized LDWs as wins and never seemed uncertain about their miscategorization e. Given the more conservative of the two subcategorizations i. Thus, over half of our sample We assert that the audiovisual feedback given in multiline video slot machine games may be effective at hiding monetary loss.

Novices in our study who experienced many LDWs recalled winning significantly more often than participants who experienced relatively fewer LDWs, regardless of how many times they actually won. We believe that this misremembered win frequency is one source of evidence suggesting that participants psychologically miscategorize LDWs as wins, rather than correctly categorizing these outcomes as losses. We argue that the similarity in the audiovisual feedback accompanying both wins and LDWs leads to perceptual conflation of LDWs and actual wins and, as a result, to participants' psychological miscategorization of LDWs as wins.

Therefore, we predicted that novices who experienced more LDWs during the playing session would show a larger overestimated win frequency than participants who experienced fewer LDWs. Indeed, we found that participants who played the six-line game greater number of LDWs significantly overestimated how many times they won compared to participants who played the three-line game relatively fewer LDWs.

Although we contend that novices miscategorize LDWs as wins, leading many individuals to estimate that they won significantly more often they actually had, some limitations should be noted and further investigated. For instance, given that we used an actual slot machine, we were unable to control for extraneous variables, such as the number of bonus rounds if any the participant experienced during the playing session or the size of individual and potentially large wins.

These sources of variability would show up as error variance, and possibly reduce effect sizes since the payback percentage is the same regardless of the number of lines played. We take this finding as a second line of evidence that many novices are unaware that they are losing money on these outcomes. An ongoing study in our lab contradicts this view. In the new study we used more precise language to investigate how players encoded LDWs. After spins on a slot machine simulator, the majority These combined results suggest that the audiovisual feedback accompanying LDWs may be very effective at hiding monetary loss from some novices and that these novices believe that they won money more often than they actually had.

These results are important because miscategorizing LDWs as wins would effectively increase the reinforcement rates of these games despite the fact that players are losing money on these outcomes. Given that we found that the majority of novices miscategorized LDWs as wins, we also presumed that novices might find games with more LDWs more subjectively arousing, exciting or enjoyable than games with fewer LDWs.

In this study, however, we failed to find any differences in participants' subjective experiences. Below we acknowledge a few reasons why these differences may not have emerged.

First, our subjective questions may not have been sensitive measures of subjective enjoyment, excitement and arousal. Future research should use subjective measures with known psychometric properties. Moreover, due to ethical constraints, participants in this study were not asked to play with their own money. This is a limitation of the study, as the potentially exciting element of risk in gambling was not present during game play.

Second, while playing on an actual machine may be more enjoyable or arousing than playing on a simulator, the fact that we did not have precise empirical control over the outcomes number of actual wins, losses, LDWs, size of wins, and bonus round entries may have differentially influenced participants' subjective experiences.

In addition, participants in the three-line relatively fewer LDW game were asked to bet two rather than one credits per line in order to equate the groups' spin wagers. As a result, despite experiencing fewer reinforced spins wins plus LDWs in the three-line game, these participants would have also experienced in general larger reinforcement on spins which could have influenced their subjective experiences. Another possibility is that novice players or subsets of novice players simply do not find slot machine games with more LDWs more arousing, exciting or enjoyable than games with fewer LDWs.

We would like to fully acknowledge that our current results might not necessarily generalize to experienced or problem gamblers. In fact, we suggest that experienced gamblers may be fully aware that they are losing money on LDWs. Nevertheless, LDWs could still potentially influence these gamblers' behaviours.

They argued that this persistence is consistent with learning theory — namely, that intermittent reinforcement leads to behaviours that are more resistant to extinction. Future research should investigate whether LDWs also lead gamblers to persist in gambling for longer during a losing streak. A pathways model of problem and pathological gambling. Addiction , 97 5: Thus it is possible that some gamblers could be more sensitive to LDWs as they offer some rather than no return and offer external stimulation which may reduce mind-wandering and rumination.

This is a hypothesis that should be tested in future research. Another possibility is that LDWs could influence gambling-related erroneous cognitions. For instance, Haw Haw, J. The multiplier potential of slot machines predicts bet size. Analysis of Gambling Behavior , 3 1: Langer Langer, E. The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , It would be fruitful for research to test this hypothesis explicitly. Despite the aforementioned limitations of this study, the current findings, when combined with the results of Dixon et al.

As previously discussed, we believe that a utility of research on novice gamblers is to identify features of slot machine games which may lead to initial game preferences amongst new gamblers and encourage future gambling behaviours. Further research is needed to evaluate the influence of LDWs on novices' and experienced gamblers' behaviours. The implications of our findings are to inform future research and to help design educational materials that can promote responsible gambling, inform public policy and reduce misconceptions about slot machines — games that are available in several countries throughout the world.

We would like to thank Karl Borgmann and Jackey Lee for their help in coding participants' subjective reports. We would also like to thank Ryan Lee for helping to test pilot subjects for this study. Funding for this research was provided by the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada through postgraduate scholarships to the first author and through research grants to M.

Submit an article Journal homepage. Received 08 Nov Introduction Slot machines and other electronic gaming machines EGMs have long been associated with problem gambling PG. Method Participants A total of 47 undergraduate students 27 females from the University of Waterloo participated in this study for financial remuneration. Design Participants were randomly assigned to play either a three-line fewer expected LDWs or a six-line relatively more expected LDWs Lobstermania game.

Candice Jensen , Mike J. Dixon , Kevin A. Harrigan , Emily Sheepy , Jonathan A. Procedure Upon arrival, participants read an information letter and signed a consent form. Results Estimated number of wins during the spin playing session Table 1 shows the mean number of observed LDWs, number of observed wins and observed ending balance in credits for the participants in the three-line and six-line groups.

Mean observed slot machine outcomes during the spin playing session. Standard deviations are shown in brackets. Regression coefficients and statistics from the model predicting participants' win estimates from observed numbers of actual wins and game played 3-lines with few LDWs or 6- lines with many LDWs.

Subjective experience We surmised that if players miscategorized LDWs as wins, then participants who experienced more LDWs during the playing session may have found the game more subjectively arousing, exciting or enjoyable than participants who experienced fewer LDWs during the playing session.

What if that last losing spin was supposed to be a winning spin except for a malfunction? Do we ever find out about malfunctions in favor of players, or do the casinos just keep that money and say nothing?

But for this lady…no money, no lawsuit, but the casino would be smart to just do something nice for her. She is entitled to it because the slot machine stated so, malfunction or not. NO they should give her the for her trouble and letting her think she won for an entire 24 hours.

But a fucking cheap assed 10 dollar casino stead? Will the casino find them and reimburse them since the machine was obviously malfunctioning? If she is so broke and such a bad life , what the hell she doing playing in the casino in the first place, takes money to win money. I must have missed the part in the story where it said she was broke. Can you point it out for me? Mmm… I wonder if Trump is the owner of the casino.

And now I see from where he is getting the million dollras for his campaing. If the machine malfunction you dont get paid, there is no way a machine that pays out max is going to pay out almost 43 million. And her lawyer is a fool for saying they are going to sue, wont hold up in court. They will be setting up a go fund me page soon, cause everyone will feel sorry for her and then she can be rich that way. What a bitter end to your response.

I wonder how many times that people lose in a slot machine are considered malfunctions? I suspect we will never know as the casino pockets those without comment. It is stories like these that make me wonder why anyone gambles. All you commenting give her the money, your fools cause they cant. Other Machines pay out large amounts daily. But you sure are not going to get millions from a machine that pays max of There is no way and she didnt win the max of so they cant pay her it.

That lawyer is setting her up , he will get paid but she wont!!! They get to keep their profits high. As already stated, The Gaming Commission is federal. Says so right upfront. Since this is through the Gaming Commission and it is well documented, no lawyer is going to bother with this one. Obviously, casinos are crooked. This is not the first time this has happened.

They can malfunction easier than mechanical machines. Back to One Armed Bandits!!! Casinos are truly evil businesses and operate on a Mafia mentality. Tells me that these machines are set up to NOT ever win!

Just a form of legal robbery. The Machine said max gave her a win of 42 million and then she got 2. The max pay maybe p but there not trying t hive her that much. They only want to give her a steak dinner. ALL casinos are mobbed-up criminal enterprises. You should expect to be robbed.

When you give your money to organized crime in ANY casino, you are beinf a moron. Thats nothing to the casinos and honestly they should make sure their dated machines dont malfunction. It was a malfunction and it does happen on occasion and sucks but all she is entitled to are the credits that were left on the machine before the error happened.

I really expect to see Al Sharpton will be there defending this poor woman. Maybe they can get Obama to come down , he could bring Hellary Rotten Clinton she is always screaming about defending blacks. What is, was the advertised maximum dollar payout of that gaming machine….

She should receive that amount as a goodwill gesture, and have her go away…Clearly that machine had a malfunction…Now, if she were white, would clearly have more privileges, leverage…….. That is still her money and should be given back. Yeah I understand that but if they do that with her how many other people are going to expect that?

I wish we could but if you do that for one person everyone will expect it if they lose. I feel bad for her but we have rules we have to follow like any other business. The sign was made by a human and could be wrong. They have the ultimate authority in any payouts and can refuse. We are pretty fair but in this case it was a machine malfunction. What I would suggest is learning how to gamble. Every machine has a listing of what the payouts are. The machine says she won 43 million.

No machine at any casino pays out that much and is obviously a malfunction. What she is entitled to though is the credits she had left on the machine before this malfunction occurred. Did she really think she won 42 million on a machine that has a max payout ? Every machine has a set limit as to how much you can receive in winnings unless it is a progressive machine. Those usually have displays that say what the top prize is.

If a machine malfunctions which in this case it clearly did, then the winnings are voided and unfortunately the customer receives nothing. Where I work if the machine were to malfunction like this, we would give them what credits were left in the machine before the malfunction occurred because technically that is still their money.

But we cannot give them more than what the machine is supposed to pay. The machine clearly malfunctioned. Winnings this big would never be printed on a ticket and given to the customer right then and there, which is what the machine told her.

We do honor jackpots. However we will not honor jackpots that are far above the max payout of a machine. No machine pays out millions as a jackpot. Also there is a screen that shows you what the machine pays out as well as what credit amount and symbols you need to get the maximum amount the machine pays out. In this case she had neither was only entitled to what credits were left on the machine before the malfunction occurred.

Casinos are evil as evil gets so avoid them by all means as there are better things to do in life. The casinos — thru PR and misinformation- had misled people into thinking that their places are just for recreation and entertainment and not a crooked place where they prey on the weaknesses of people to take their hard-earned money and screw their lives afterwards.

You can see the glitz and glamor from the outside but the pain and suffering from the lives they had destroyed are all unseen. We hardly destroy lives, people come here either for the entertainment or food. Or in many cases to drink. We do what we can to cater to our customers but in this case it was a machine malfunction and the machines state when that occurs all payouts are voided. I feel bad for her but it seems more ignorance on her part of how the payouts work on a machine.

There is a screen you can pull up that tells you what credits you need to bet and what symbols you need to have to get the max payout. No they did not.. No machine can payout millions of dollars. More Bix Nood garbage. YES the machine malfunctioned and YES the casino should payout the max for that machine as a good will measure toward gamers but Queen Latifalafal needs to get a grip on reality.

The casino should have offered her more than a steak dinner though. It was clearly a malfunction of the program in the machine. Must be a Trump casino. Since there was a program code error, it registered another amount that is not legal binding to the machine and the NY state gaming.

I know, I worked in the industry. This lawsuit will be thrown out. They are now going to suffer more than that in bad PR and legal fees. Who is to say it broke? Seems to me to be the same way our government works. Her number won just happens to be the limit of an unsigned long integer data type which ranges from 0 to 4,,, It could be considered as -1 so she lost one dollar!

Programmers like to use ffffffff as kind of a placeholder. So this machine needs a software update! Seems to happen more and more: She should get the 42 mil. The machine clearly states this.

O fuckin well if their machine works or not. Thats their problem not the customers. No machine in this country pays that much as a payout for a jackpot. All she is entitled to is the amount of credits she had on the machine before this malfunction happened which she received. They get reimbursed the amount of credits that were on the machine before the malfunction occurred.

She was given that. I hope she wins some kind of lawsuit against them for similar money. It hurts seeing that video lol. No, machines are only set to pay out a certain amount. No machine in this country is set to pay out millions. She was given what credits were left on the machine as that was still her money. If you read the payout screen it will tell you what symbols and credit amount you need to win the total payout. There is usually a button called max bet on a machine and that is the highest amount you can bet but that is also usually the only way to win the max amount the machine is supposed to pay out.

I see it like this. You are playing a game of chance which means playing the odds. The odds say she won. At the every least it shows a jackpot which means she won the max pay out. As others have said. If its good enough for the casino to not pay out because of a malfunction then how many people did it tell lost because of a malfunction but never received a payout. How many casinos know their machine malfunctioned and told the players it lost even thought it rolled a jackpot but never came forward to give the people it told lost their real winning.

I would be upset too if I were in her shoes. The first 8 digits of her jackpot just happen to be the first 8 digits of the unsigned integer max value. The cents value is likely calculated from another integer. How people find casinos fun is beyond me. I tried it out when I was in my early twenties and always left feeling cheated and depressed. Not my idea of a good time.

Use that money to go on an all inclusive vacation in the Caribbean or something. Happens all the time in the casinos. Ya, i would sue for sure. Of course they knew it was a malfunction as it is probably set to never pay off!!!! Sounds like a criminal enterprise to me!!!! Then determining that nothing was done on the part of the person playing that particular machine illegally to generate the win on that particular gaming machine they then escort you out to the payout window where you are immediately paid.

You are then escorted out of the casino by casino security to ensure that you get safely to your vehicle and they even watch you drive off. So many people have tried suing over this in the past. Your lawyer is ripping you off and taking you on another malfunction ride along.

Would the casino still have to pay? Since the casino removed the machine to fix it right after she won or supposedly malfunction there would no way to prove it since the casino fix the gaming machine right away. The gaming machine should have sat right where it is while the gaming commission verifies it malfunctioned. If a computer makes a mistake and sends someone a 45 million dollar power water or cell phone bill would they be obligated to pay it??

Every legal electronic gaming machine in this USA has a void all payouts disclaimer if the machine malfunctions so she has no case end of discussion. Let her get in line with the other idiots who tried the same thing when the computers they were playing aka slot machines malfunctioned and they got little or nothing and see how far she gets. If you do happen to get ahead you better plan on never returning for the rest of your life or you will give it back and then some. Take it and do not spend the money at the casino.

This shows how fixed gambling in a casino really is. If it truly were a game of randomness, then the house should take on the responsibility of a rogue machine. This woman is right. But hey, do what you want. But the casino never search for malfunctions when the machine is eating your money, so at least have the decency to cover your loss when you machine screws up the other way.

Tons of companies have settled out of court with people to protect their reputations. But it is certainly nothing like rolling dice or a roulette wheel. I worked in various slot departments for all of them. I was a slot mechanic expert slot repairman. The casino was being very generous by offering her a comp steak dinner. She needs to take that and be happy! Do you know what CSV means? And what kind of pathetic person has to upvote their own posts when no one else will…?

Seach engines can be misleading…. So you are going to try and claim that the NY State Gambling Commission did not validate the game prior to putting it on the gaming floor? Obviously, something was changed ….

Bit rot is the slow deterioration in the performance and integrity of data stored on storage media. It is also known by the names bit decay, data rot, data decay and silent corruption. Please, stop using the internet as source of reliable information.

You are looking like stupid fool! They are just like computer monitors. The stupidity you are babbling is like saying a computer monitor is the heart of a computer.

Got it, or do you need a map? Do you know what the Resorts World Casino is? Those slot machines are just monitors. I will ask you again… Prove it big man… show us your qualifications to be able to make that claim…. Well if you are such an expert why are you unable to prove your point that all video slot machines are server based?

There is nothing to prove. It is what it is. Prove it wrong, can you? Something was obviously wrong with the server side software. So you expect people to believe that the New York Gaming Commission and the Casino colluded and conspired to keep Katrina from winning her money…? NO software is perfect, because coders are humans and humans make mistakes.

That does not means that you can get just get away with that. If so, the court system would be innecessary and no one would ever be sued. That statement is not a size fits all, and the commission is not supreme ruler. You know that, right? Courts will decide who is right in this particular case. It has happened before. Sometimes courts have decided in favor of the casinos, sometimes in favor of the gamers. That plays against you. Unfortunately the law as it currently stands does not make a future court challenge brought by Katrina look very likely to succeed, but who knows?

What is the game? If the casino claims that it was a malfunction , and that malfunctions void prizes. It is the same that happens with drugs. They have one thousand and one disclaimers, but that is not an absolute shield. Casinos have gone too far, for too long with the glitches excuse. Have they done enough to promote fair gaiming?

It is not enough to just put a disclaimer. Why tamper with the evidence so fast? She is making a claim based on what happened, and what was promised. Someone with no interests in the controversy a judge, jury will decide based on the facts presented to them. Right now you sided with the version of the casino without having any other information. The Commission is not the ultimate ruler and she is right by fighting it.

Specially with so many cases concerning glitches and high payouts in slot machines. I sided with her for two reasons: Obviously, casinos have not done enough to avoid them. The LOSER that moderates this piece of junk seems to be too sensitive and everything is put under review. No way to comment that way. What part of that do you no comprende por favor….? She will sue, she will lose and the only way to make them pay is by a violent physical attack that could cost them millions and her, her life!

The government and the casinos are partners! If this was clearly marked on the machine , there would be no question that it was not a malfunction…If there is no max limit displayed on the machine there will be questions asked at trial………..

Why not just go out in to your yard and light your money on fire? Yes I read the article missy. So anytime someone wins big the casino can just claim it was a malfunction and not have to pay? What is to stop them from doing that every time someone wins a lot of money? Either the Casino, the Gaming Commission or both will go over the game with a fine tooth comb so they will find what caused the error and correct it.

When he tried to collect the local goon said the Mob would pay off but the winner would only end up spending it on medical bills. He quit asking for his winnings. So if that machine was defective, it should not have been online. Every penny of it.

Remember everything is balanced in favor of the house NOT the gambler. I weep for the future. This is why they place disclaimers. There is no way I believe that an average casino is going to be dishing out 40 million on a slot machine. She should just claim that the machine is being racist against her and then Sharpton will send all the blacks to that Casino to loot, raid, pillage and destroy it. Dishonest and only need you for your money. I would totally sue.. A malfunction voids ALL pay and play.

If it malfunctions the other way do they give us our money back? Next time anyone loses any money, it must be a malfunction. Here is the problem if the machine malfunctions and never pays out the casino does not refund money but if the machine malfunctions and does pay out the casino pays out nothing. That hardly seems fair the law needs to be changed but will not because the casinos have the money to control the law makers. Other thing Trump lost millions as the owner of casinos you really have to wonder how a person can do that without being really dumb considering everything is in the casinos favor.

No you idiot… He got a really bad loan with high interest to build his taj mahal…yes lack of patrons hurt but he was a stupid businessman to begin with. I have run a lot of companies in a good and bad economy and did not lose money the way Trump did because I like most good business people controlled costs. You increase sales by reducing profit margin but only slightly and to remain competitive.

Trump instead increased his costs with excessive spending even you should have figured out that does not work. Its always a lose-lose situation save your money. I live in Vegas.

Slots are like the state lottery; real big jackpot winners are few and far between. So, they know when it malfunctions. When you play it, you accept that. A sign on a machine is no more a legal contract than a sign that states a business is not responsible for damages or theft of your property. Any lawyer could eat that up. And no, the casino nor, the gaming commission knows when a slot machine pays out.

Sorry, you are wrong. The casinos have to have a way to protect themselves, for becoming bankrupt by a malfunction. They are not as stupid as you think. They have lots of money, and do this for a living.

They have legally assured themselves a way to avoid the risk. They need to be sued for their incompetence and indirect false advertising if they are leading people to believe they have a chance to win a super grand prize on lesser machines.

I suspect the gaming commission is as corrupt as the casino itself. So too offering her a steak dinner based on the foul up was a cheap shot. She was smart to take a selfie of herself in front of the screen. Hopefully things might turn out better for her as a function of the legal system. Welcome to the world of a corrupt system of gambling. All jackpots have to be verified by a Commission that is paid for by the casinos and insurance industry.

Neither of these entities are in business to spend money. This happens far more than you think. Since they had to get tax information, the lady was illegal. Instead of cutting the payment, they had her arrested and never had to pay out. Give her some grits and be done with it! SideEye October 29, at 9: Notyer October 30, at Nancy O'Malley October 30, at Obsidiana October 30, at Notyer November 2, at 7: Nancy O'Malley November 2, at RaMontu October 30, at 9: Joe Flood October 30, at 9: Powell October 30, at 9: Steve Saunders October 30, at Rob Ricci October 30, at George October 30, at Emily October 30, at Erin O'Connor October 30, at 9: James Petersen October 30, at 9: Xia Tianhun October 30, at Ted October 30, at Powell October 30, at 2: Debbie Wood October 30, at 9: Annomous1 October 30, at PCisAfalsegod October 30, at Fa October 30, at Socrates Descartes October 30, at Mike Berry October 30, at Maverick Doe October 30, at Dorrell Perry October 30, at Daniel Tilson October 30, at Greg October 30, at Daniel October 30, at VictoryRider October 30, at Roger Doger October 30, at DemonSpawn October 30, at Juck October 30, at William Kulas October 30, at Mark October 30, at The Unfan October 30, at Rational Muslim October 30, at October 30, at HighHeelShoes October 30, at KenD October 30, at Vince Kissinger October 30, at Adam Stein October 30, at Caroline Mcclain October 30, at Len Sotsky October 30, at Jeff Chapman October 30, at Tom Lindemann October 30, at Benjamin Dover October 30, at Mel Holden October 30, at Socrates Descartes October 30, at 3: Sparrow October 30, at SRT October 30, at 2: John Mortensen October 30, at LolaS October 30, at 1: October 30, at 3: LolaS November 12, at 4: John Mortensen October 30, at 2: SofaKingCool1 October 30, at LolaS October 30, at Hana18 October 30, at 9: Franklin Park October 30, at 9: James Cahill October 30, at 9: Patrick Ronsmans October 30, at 9: Dave October 30, at Joseph October 30, at 9: BN October 30, at 9: Powell October 30, at Steven Harsch October 30, at Mary Babb October 30, at Mike Gregory October 30, at Mike Stoner October 30, at Maverick Doe October 30, at 2: Maverick Doe October 31, at 8: Susan Christensen October 30, at Susan Christensen October 30, at 1: Rubber Jesus October 30, at Stephanie October 30, at 1: James Andrews October 30, at Steveaspesi October 30, at Larry Blaker October 30, at Phillipe Alexander October 30, at Jack Scarpon October 30, at Phil Williamson October 30, at John Magnuson October 30, at 9: Brett Lovejoy October 30, at Jolly Roger October 30, at Bree Zee October 30, at 3: Doc Last October 30, at Jim October 30, at 4: David M October 30, at 4: Scott Maxwell October 30, at 4: Robin October 30, at 5: Birdmom October 30, at 7: PJ Bear October 30, at 9: Don Goodwin October 30, at 4: Kathy Huish October 31, at Doc Last December 20, at Doc Last October 30, at 9: Dennis G October 30, at 4: Ruspert October 30, at 7: Tom Freeman October 30, at Len Sotsky October 31, at 6: October 31, at 8: David M October 31, at 9: LuLu November 1, at 9: David M November 1, at ElCauso November 20, at 6: David M November 21, at 9: Herminaw Williams October 30, at 4: FatManChew October 30, at 7: FatManChew October 30, at 8: Ed Walden October 30, at Ruspert October 31, at 7: FatManChew October 30, at 9: David M October 31, at 4: Jerry Lynch October 30, at 8: Bree Zee October 31, at 7: Nonuna Persona October 30, at 2: Gilbert Lay October 30, at PlatinumEBT October 30, at DooDah73 October 30, at SuMtOnE October 30, at SuMtOnE November 1, at 6: David Perrier October 30, at Glen Corona October 30, at PeterMaskell October 30, at 1: Rose Arena Breslin October 30, at 1: Dave McConnell October 30, at 2: Donald j cook October 30, at 2: David Lee Gardner October 30, at 7: Donald j cook October 30, at 7: Timothy Tracey October 30, at 3: Sally Sparrow October 30, at 7: FUD Hater October 30, at 4: Timothy Tracey November 1, at 4: Sally Sparrow November 1, at 8: Timothy Tracey November 3, at 4: Sally Sparrow November 4, at 4: Sally Sparrow November 5, at 9: Timothy Tracey November 7, at 7: Sally Sparrow November 9, at 6: Timothy Tracey November 9, at 6: Sally Sparrow November 9, at 7: Morgan October 30, at 1: Just Me October 30, at 1: JohnDille October 30, at 2: Randy October 30, at 3: Harry October 30, at 4: Cliff Ferrell October 30, at 6: Nick Sinclair October 30, at 8: Robert Warner October 30, at 5: JohnDille October 31, at 9: Just Me January 22, at 9: Powell October 30, at 1: NO October 30, at 2: Powell October 30, at 3: ElCauso October 30, at 4: NO October 31, at 1: ElCauso November 2, at Harry November 4, at 4: James Rizan October 30, at 9: Powell October 31, at 1: H MAN October 30, at 1: Vigneux October 30, at 1: Henry Simpson October 30, at 3: H MAN October 30, at 3: Imran Khan October 30, at 3: H MAN October 30, at 4: Imran Khan November 10, at 7: AnonProxZ October 30, at 2: DaveB October 30, at 1: October 30, at 1: October 30, at 2: Sharon Russell October 30, at 3: DaveB October 31, at 7: Dee Bunkers October 30, at 3: AnonProxZ October 30, at 3: Thanatos October 30, at 5: Mike Surack October 30, at 1: AmVet October 30, at 1: AmVet November 6, at 4: JohnDille October 31, at Mike Surack October 30, at 8: Only a Comment October 30, at 2: Deon Charles October 30, at 2: James Gerber October 30, at 2: Chana Ben-Shimon October 30, at 1: Bob Taylor October 30, at 2: Roknrobin Thirty-two October 30, at 2: Don Lackie October 30, at 3: Bob October 30, at 3: Michelle Notinterested October 30, at 1: C M October 30, at 2: Bob October 30, at 2: Peggy Fahy October 30, at Craig Smith October 30, at 3: Donald j cook October 30, at LACountyRedneck November 15, at Donald j cook November 17, at 6: Nick Sinclair October 30, at 7: ScooterGirl October 30, at 7: Bryan Walczak October 30, at 8: James Rizan October 30, at 8: Robin Credit October 30, at 7: NewYorkJohn October 30, at 1: Jobe October 30, at 2: David Lee Gardner October 30, at 8: Donald j cook October 30, at 9: Nothing November 1, at 9: Grape Ape October 30, at Sally Sparrow October 30, at Socrates Descartes October 30, at 1: TheTruth October 30, at Nancy O'Malley October 30, at 4: Mark October 30, at 1: J J October 30, at Grape Ape October 31, at 9: Robert Campbell October 30, at 3: Blaine October 30, at Mike Roller October 30, at 1: Painful-Truth October 30, at Dudeas October 30, at 1: Jason Bartlett October 30, at 2: Kitty October 30, at Nonuna Persona October 30, at 1: Sol Rothstein October 30, at 2: David Gould October 30, at 3: Ex Isheep October 30, at 5: David Pyc October 30, at 8: Dean Champion October 30, at 9: Dean Champion October 30, at 2: Chris Krolack October 30, at All Labs Matter October 30, at Dean Champion October 31, at Al October 30, at 9: Ted Stanwood October 30, at 9: Socrates Descartes October 30, at 4: Magicdragon53 October 30, at 9: Spam Box October 30, at 9: Jojosdad 1 October 30, at 9: Richard Janus October 30, at 9: Scott Anderson October 30, at Dee Dwyer October 30, at SackLunch22 October 30, at

Pokies Online Crossword Free

Lightning Link Slot Machine 🌟 BIG WIN🌟 Heart Throb Slot Free Games and Lightning Link Bonus Won